Table 12.
Comparison of past studies based on their performance of BHS metrics.
| Study | SBP (%) in BHS Metrics | DBP (%) in BHS Metrics | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade A | Grade B | Grade C | Attained Grade | Grade A | Grade B | Grade C | Attained Grade | |
| Esmaelpoor et al. [39] | 74 | 94 | 98 | A | 93 | 99 | 100 | A |
| Ibtehaz et al. [13] | 71 | 85 | 91 | B | 83 | 92 | 96 | A |
| Li et al. [22] | 60 | 80 | 89 | B | 77 | 96 | 100 | A |
| Hsu et al. [21] | 81 | 96 | 98 | A | 90 | 98 | 100 | A |
| Athaya et al. [25] | 76 | 94 | 99 | A | 94 | 99 | 100 | A |
| Harfiya et al. [23] | 71 | 94 | 99 | A | 91 | 99 | 100 | A |
| Miao et al. [40] | 50 | 76 | 90 | B | 66 | 90 | 97 | A |
| Baker et al. [65] | 68 | 90 | 97 | A | 83 | 96 | 99 | A |
| Rong et al. [66] | 54 | 87 | 94 | B | 83 | 95 | 98 | A |
| Qin et al. [41] | 59 | 86 | 95 | B | 82 | 96 | 99 | A |
| This Study | 92 | 99 | 99 | A | 99 | 100 | 100 | A |
*%: The percentage of predicted signals falling within 5 (Grade A), 10 (Grade B), and 15 (Grade C) mmHg of their respective ground truth signals, respectively.