Table 2.
Challenges identified in literature | Median ranking score (range) a |
---|---|
Critical data will be missing | 2 (1–9) |
There will be implementation burden for state NBS laboratories | 3 (1–8) |
State-level implementation will take considerable time | 4 (1–7) |
There will be RUSP review burden | 5 (1–9) |
Yet-to-be determined disorder heterogeneity will complicate clinical decision making | 5 (1–9) |
Major expansion of state bioinformatics capabilities will be needed | 6 (2–9) |
Accessible state follow-up programs will need to be developed and implemented | 6 (1–8) |
There will be uncertainties about long-term benefits and risks of transformative therapies | 7 (1–9) |
Educational materials and resources will need to be developed | 9 (1–9) |
a Instructions were to rank the challenges (from 1 to 9) in order of importance to allow rapid implementation of NBS for 30 conditions, where 1 = most important
* Missing data for one participant