Skip to main content
. 2022 Jan 31;8:826687. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2021.826687

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Improved functional and pathologic recovery in ischemic muscles after treatment with MSCE−selectin−GFP. (A) Quantitative analysis of distance ran (m) prior to exhaustion in treatment groups (Vehicle = 4, MSCGFP = 7, MSCE−selectin−GFP = 10), **P < 0.01 via ANOVA). (B) Representative image of MSCGFP vs. MSCE−selectin−GFP on treadmill. (C) Qualitative analysis of the mean myofiber size of the ischemic calf muscle, data are based on 5 section/sample/mouse (μm2, mean ± SD, **P < 0.01 via ANOVA, *P < 0.05 post-hoc Tukey Simultaneous Tests for Differences of Means, Vehicle treatment n = 3, MSCGFP treatment n = 3, MSCE−selectin−GFP treatment n = 3). (D) Representative images of transverse H&E sections of ischemic calf muscle in Vehicle, MSCGFP, and MSCE−selectin−GFP.