Skip to main content
. 2022 Feb 13;4(5):479–487. doi: 10.1016/j.cjco.2022.02.002

Table 1.

Baseline characteristics of participants

Characteristic Total (N = 31)
Age at heart transplant, y 47.6 (33.0–60.9)
Female 10 (32.3)
Race
 Caucasian 16 (51.6)
 Black 5 (16.1)
 Asian 7 (22.6)
 Mixed 3 (9.7)
Indication for cardiac transplant
 Nonischemic 16 (51.6)
 Ischemic 6 (19.4)
 Hypertrophic 5 (16.1)
 Congenital 1 (3.2)
 Other 3 (9.7)
Bridged with durable LVAD 10 (32.3)
Bridged with CMAG or ECMO 4 (12.9)
Medical history after transplant
 Hypertension 17 (54.8)
 Diabetes 14 (45.2)
 Chronic kidney disease 10 (32.3)
Graft function
 Pacemaker 6 (20.0)
 History of primary graft dysfunction 3 (10.0)
 Cardiac allograft vasculopathy 9 (32.1)
 Acute cellular rejection at 1 year 16 (53.3)
 Treated antibody-mediated rejection 2 (6.7)
 Persistent donor-specific antibody 7 (23.3)
 History of graft impairment (LVEF < 50%) 4 (12.9)
 LVEF, % 61.0 (57.0–65.0)
Complications after transplant
 Cancer 3 (10.0)
 Treated CMV 5 (16.7)
Immunosuppression
 Prednisone 26 (83.9)
 Tacrolimus 23 (74.2)
 Cyclosporine 5 (16.1)
 Mycophenolic acid 24 (77.4)
 Sirolimus 10 (32.3)

Data are presented as median (interquartile range) and count (percentage) for continuous and categorical data, respectively. Graft dysfunction was defined as any history of decline in LVEF of 15% or more from baseline.

CMAG, CentriMag biventricular assist device; CMV, cytomegalovirus; ECMO, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation; LVAD, left ventricular assist device; LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction.