Skip to main content
. 2022 Jan 12;36(2):e24242. doi: 10.1002/jcla.24242

TABLE 2.

C t value and clinical performance comparison of each of the target genes for real‐time reverse‐transcription PCR assays

Genes Allplex SARS‐CoV‐2/FluA/FluB/RSV kit Standard M nCoV real‐time detection kit U‐TOP COVID‐19 detection kit
S RdRp N RdRp E ORF1ab N S E
C t value (mean ± SD) 26.44 ± 6.94 26.52 ± 7.29 25.28 ± 6.72 25.76 ± 6.89 25.65 ± 6.71 27.62 ± 6.66 28.20 ± 6.49 28.34 ± 6.69 27.72 ± 6.53
Sensitivity (95% CI) 98.88 (93.90–99.97) 97.75 (92.12–99.73) 95.51 (88.89–98.76) 100 (95.94–100) 97.75 (92.12–99.73) 97.75 (92.12–99.73) 96.63 (90.46–99.30) 94.38 (87.38–98.15) 97.75 (92.12–99.73)
Specificity (95% CI) 99.38 (96.57–99.98) 100 (97.72–100) 100 (97.72–100) 100 (97.72–100) 100 (97.72–100) 100 (97.72–100) 100 (97.72–100) 100 (97.72–100) 100 (97.72–100)

The clinical performance was evaluated based on the reference standard results, which was defined by the consensus criterion.

Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; C t , cycle threshold; SD, standard deviation