Table 1.
Number of focus group discussions (FGDs) and in-depth interviews (IDIs) conducted in three regions of northern Tanzania to discuss human and/or animal health
| Stake-holder type* | Topic discussed | Stakeholders present | Tier | Number of FGDs/IDIs** | Locations (Village’s Region) | No. participants/village |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AHP | Animal health | Animal healthcare providers | Lower | 3 | Kilimanjaro | 1 (IDI) |
| Arusha | 6 | |||||
| Mwanza | 1 (IDI) | |||||
| CAH | Animal health | Community members | Lower | 3 | Kilimanjaro | 10 |
| Arusha | 12 | |||||
| Mwanza | 8 | |||||
| CHH | Human health | Community members | Lower | 3 | Kilimanjaro | 6 |
| Arusha | 13 | |||||
| Mwanza | 7 | |||||
| HHP | Human health | Human healthcare providers | Lower | 3 | Kilimanjaro | 5 |
| Arusha | 8 | |||||
| Mwanza | 11 | |||||
| HHP | Human health | Human healthcare providers | Higher/middle | 39 IDI/2 FGD | Kilimanjaro | 38 (30 IDI + 8 in FGD) |
| Mwanza | 16 (9 IDI + 7 in FGD) | |||||
| HC | Human and animal health | Community members | Lower | 4 | Kilimanjaro | 13 |
| Arusha | 9 | |||||
| Mwanza | 13 | |||||
| Total | 57 interviews | 136 participants |
*The following stakeholders were involved: animal healthcare providers (AHPs), community animal health (CAH) workers, community human health (CHH) workers, human healthcare providers (HHPs), and community members. In the health campaign (HC) FGDs, animal health and human health were discussed with community members
**All but 2 interviews in communities were in FGD format, but IDIs were conducted when there were no other participants/providers available. All interviews in higher tiers were IDIs