Skip to main content
. 2022 Jan 21;12(1):421–436. doi: 10.3233/JPD-212892

Table 4.

Cognitive performance over time in Parkinson’s disease

Men (N = 277) Women (N = 146)
Variable Baseline (N = 277) Month 12 (N = 261) Month 24 (N = 248) Month 36 (N = 239) Month 48 (N = 230) Month 60 (N = 210) Baseline (N = 146) Month 12 (N = 136) Month 24 (N = 130) Month 36 (N = 127) Month 48 (N = 117) Month 60 (N = 107) p Interaction (Sex vs Time)** p Time Time effect
Cognition by testing
  MCI or Dementia (ref group) 9 (14%) 32 (19%) 40 (17%) 53 (23%) 49 (23%) 45 (23%) 6 (15%) 17 (17%) 19 (15%) 16 (13%) 10 (9%) 12 (12%) 0.082 0.780 0.99
  Normal Cognition 56 (86%) 133 (81%) 198 (83%) 178 (77%) 168 (77%) 151 (77%) 34 (85%) 84 (83%) 108 (85%) 107 (87%) 103 (91%) 88 (88%)
  Missing 212 96 10 8 13 14 106 35 3 4 4 7
Investigator Diagnosis of Cognitive State
  MCI or Dementia (ref group) 9 (14%) 27 (16%) 45 (18%) 60 (25%) 59 (26%) 48 (24%) 0 (0%) 13 (13%) 16 (13%) 20 (16%) 16 (14%) 13 (12%) 0.938 < 0.001 0.86
  Normal Cognition 56 (86%) 143 (84%) 200 (82%) 179 (75%) 166 (74%) 156 (76%) 41 (100%) 88 (87%) 111 (87%) 105 (84%) 99 (86%) 92 (88%)
  Missing 212 91 3 0 5 6 105 35 3 2 2 2
MocA
  Mean (SD) 26.9 (2.4) 25.9 (2.9) 26.0 (3.2) 26.0 (2.9) 26.2 (3.4) 26.2 (3.7) 27.5 (2.2) 27.1 (2.6) 26.8 (3.1) 27.1 (3.1) 26.9 (3.9) 27.3 (3.0) 0.518 < 0.001 –0.15
  Min–Max 17.0–30.0 15.0–30.0 9.0–30.0 13.0–30.0 13.0–30.0 2.0–30.0 17.0–30.0 18.0–30.0 16.0–30.0 14.0–30.0 11.0–30.0 15.0–30.0
  Missing 3 4 3 0 4 4 0 1 0 3 2 2
HVLT Immediate recall
  Mean (SD) 23.6 (4.9) 23.2 (5.3) 23.0 (5.3) 23.8 (5.9) 22.8 (5.7) 23.6 (6.6) 26.1 (4.7) 25.0 (5.4) 25.2 (5.4) 26.4 (6.1) 26.1 (5.6) 26.1 (5.8) 0.879 0.230 –0.07
  Min–Max 9.0–35.0 4.0–36.0 9.0–35.0 6.0–36.0 6.0–36.0 5.0–36.0 13.0–36.0 8.0–36.0 10.0–36.0 7.0–36.0 8.0–36.0 4.0–36.0
  Missing 0 3 0 0 5 4 1 0 0 2 2 2
HVLT delayed recall
  Mean (SD) 8.0 (2.6) 7.7 (2.8) 7.9 (2.9) 7.9 (3.1) 7.5 (3.2) 8.1 (3.3) 9.1 (2.2) 8.9 (2.9) 8.8 (2.9) 9.1 (2.8) 9.3 (2.7) 9.3 (2.9) 0.921 0.743 –0.01
  Min–Max 0.0–12.0 0.0–12.0 0.0–12.0 0.0–12.0 0.0–12.0 0.0–12.0 3.0–12.0 0.0–12.0 0.0–12.0 0.0–12.0 0.0–12.0 0.0–12.0
  Missing 0 3 0 0 5 4 1 0 0 3 2 2
Benton Judgement of Line Orientation
  Mean (SD) 13.1 (2.0) 12.8 (2.1) 13.1 (2.1) 13.0 (2.1) 13.1 (2.0) 12.6 (2.3) 12.1 (2.2) 11.5 (2.7) 12.2 (2.5) 11.8 (2.5) 12.5 (2.6) 11.9 (2.3) 0.132 0.035 –0.05
  Min–Max 6.0–15.0 5.0–15.0 0.0–15.0 5.0–15.0 5.0–15.0 4.0–15.0 5.0–15.0 2.0–15.0 4.0–15.0 3.0–15.0 2.0–15.0 5.0–15.0
  Missing 0 3 3 0 5 5 1 0 1 3 4 3
Symbol Digit Modalities Test
  Mean (SD) 40.0 (9.6) 39.8 (10.2) 38.4 (10.7) 38.2 (11.4) 37.8 (12.7) 37.8 (12.5) 43.4 (9.5) 42.7 (10.0) 43.0 (11.2) 43.2 (11.5) 42.0 (11.4) 43.6 (12.3) 0.237 < 0.001 –0.49
  Min–Max 7.0–76.0 5.0–70.0 5.0–75.0 3.0–63.0 2.0–102.0 0.0–69.0 15.0–82.0 14.0–62.0 2.0–68.0 0.0–65.0 0.0–63.0 1.0–74.0
  Missing 0 3 0 0 5 4 1 0 0 4 2 2
Letter Number Sequencing
  Mean (SD) 10.5 (2.7) 10.3 (2.8) 10.2 (2.7) 10.1 (3.0) 9.8 (3.2) 9.7 (3.0) 10.7 (2.6) 10.5 (2.5) 10.6 (2.9) 10.4 (3.1) 10.8 (3.1) 10.7 (2.7) 0.027 M: < 0.001 M: –0.19
  Min–Max 3.0–20.0 2.0–18.0 2.0–17.0 2.0–19.0 0.0–20.0 2.0–20.0 2.0–20.0 3.0–16.0 2.0–19.0 1.0–17.0 0.0–18.0 2.0–18.0 W: 0.160 W: –0.06
  Missing 0 4 0 0 5 4 1 0 0 2 2 2
Semantic Fluency
  Mean (SD) 46.3 (11.0) 46.5 (11.2) 46.7 (12.7) 46.0 (10.9) 45.1 (11.5) 45.1 (12.6) 53.1 (11.6) 53.1 (10.7) 53.3 (12.4) 52.5 (12.3) 53.8 (12.8) 54.9 (12.1) 0.037 M: 0.001 M: –0.39
  Min–Max 20.0–91.0 18.0–97.0 18.0–95.0 18.0–86.0 11.0–83.0 7.0–90.0 26.0–103.0 22.0–81.0 15.0–87.0 9.0–91.0 15.0–84.0 11.0–88.0 W: 0.590 W: 0.11
  Missing 0 4 0 0 5 4 1 0 0 2 2 2

Note: All models are also adjusted for Baseline BMI, Vascular Risk Factor Score (VRF) and Side Most Affected. Significance level for comparisons is p < 0.006 (after Bonferroni correction). **If interaction is significant, we find time effect p-value for each men and women separately. Otherwise, we provide time effect p-value without stratifying by gender. 1) After adjusting for VRF Scores and side most affected, a significant quantitative interaction is present where men are decreasing in mean Letter Number Sequencing z-score over time, with men experiencing a stronger decrease and women with no significant decrease. For every year increase, the mean Letter Number Sequencing z-score decreases by a multiplicative factor of –0.19 in men, compared to –0.06 in women. 2) After adjusting for VRF Scores and side most affected, a significant qualitative interaction is present where men are decreasing in mean Semantic Fluency z-score over time and women with no significant increase. For every year increase, the mean Semantic Fluency z-score decreases by a multiplicative factor of –0.39 in men, compared to an increase of 0.11 in women.