Abstract
Assembly-line polyketide synthases, such as the 6-deoxyerythronolide B synthase (DEBS), are large enzyme factories prized for their ability to produce specific and complex polyketide products. By channeling protein-tethered substrates across multiple active sites in a defined linear sequence, these enzymes facilitate programmed small-molecule syntheses that could theoretically be harnessed to access countless polyketide product structures. Using cryogenic electron microscopy to study DEBS module 1, we present a structural model describing this substrate-channeling phenomenon. Our 3.2- to 4.3-angstrom-resolution structures of the intact module reveal key domain-domain interfaces and highlight an unexpected module asymmetry. We also present the structure of a product-bound module that shines light on a recently described “turnstile” mechanism for transient gating of active sites along the assembly line.
Polyketide synthases (PKSs) are multi-functional enzymes that synthesize numerous complex polyketides in nature. Mining of microbial and metazoan genomes continues to add to the surplus of untapped and potentially bioactive polyketide products and hybrids thereof. Among the small fraction (<5%) of characterized polyketides and their derivatives, some important medicines (1) and agrochemicals (2) have emerged. Many PKSs are composed of multiple homodimeric modules that individually catalyze C─C bond formation and optional modification of elongated intermediates. Such multimodular PKS arrays operate as enzymatic assembly lines by orchestrating the transfer of intermediates across modules in an ordered linear sequence. An example of a prototypical assembly-line PKS is the 6-deoxyerythronolide B synthase (DEBS) from Saccharopolyspora erythraea (Fig. 1) (3, 4). A representative catalytic cycle of the first module of this assembly line is described in fig. S1.
Given the homodimeric nature of assembly-line PKSs, we had previously sought to trace, through functional analysis of hybrid DEBS proteins, the trajectory of a growing polyketide chain as it is channeled from one covalently bound state to the next (5). Our data led to a model in which polyketide translocation occurred through acyl carrier protein (ACP) → ketosynthase (KS) substrate channeling within the same subunit (intramolecularly), and chain elongation occurred through KS→CP substrate channeling across subunits (intermolecularly). In the present work, we used single-particle cryogenic electron microscopy (cryo-EM) to structurally validate this long-standing model for substrate channeling.
We present near-atomic-resolution structures of DEBS module 1 (M1, 3.2 to 4.3 Å) with backbone and side-chain resolvability in each of the relevant catalytic domains, including the ACP. In addition to validating the substrate-channeling model (Fig. 1), these structures shine light on hitherto uncharacterized domain-domain interfaces. Perhaps most unexpectedly, they also reveal module asymmetry not observed in previous structures of intact PKS modules (6-9). To further characterize a recently discovered “turnstile” mechanism (10), we also report the cryo-EM structure of DEBS M1 in its putatively turnstile-closed state, corresponding to the product-bound module. The resulting structure offers a plausible basis for KS active site shielding and vectorial biosynthesis by PKS assembly lines.
In preparation for structural analysis, we adapted a previous protocol for buffer optimization by using protein melt-curve analysis paired with catalytic activity measurements (described in the materials and methods) (11). DEBS M1 and M3 fused to the C-terminal thioesterase (TE) domain were selected as model specimens, given the extensive catalytic (12-14) and structural (15-18) characterization of M3 and the ease of access to the substrates of M1. The addition of citrate to the buffer elevated thermostability, catalytic activity, and oligomeric uniformity (figs. S2 to S6), so we used it as an additive for single-particle cryo-EM analysis. In addition to small-molecule buffer additives, antigen-binding fragments (Fabs) of antibodies can be used as tags (19, 20) to augment the sample rigidity for high-resolution structure determination. Our initial target module was a recently characterized hybrid DEBS module, M3/1, comprising fragments from M3 and M1 fused to the TE domain (i.e., KS3-AT3-KR1-ACP1-TE) (21), because all of its catalytic domains have been previously crystallographically characterized at atomic resolution (15-17, 22). M3/1 was complexed with a noninhibitory Fab (1B2) that is specific for the N-terminal docking domain (15) and purified in a buffer containing 100 mM citrate. The Fab-free module was also prepared under otherwise identical conditions (fig. S7). Combined with grid-freezing parameter optimization, diagnostic cryo-EM micrographs of the vitrified samples revealed Fab-bound modules to have markedly improved particle quality compared with Fab-free modules. This effect is likely exerted by the conformational selectivity of Fab 1B2 for modules in the dimeric state, because we previously measured numerous contacts between individual Fabs and each of the modular subunits at the dimeric interface (15). Substantiating the utility of this Fab, a companion study also used it to successfully study a PKS module from the lasalocid assembly line by single-particle cryo-EM (23). Collection of additional cryo-EM micrographs of the M3/1-Fab complex followed by particle picking and twodimensional class averaging revealed particles with features resembling an extended KS-acyltransferase (AT) didomain (fig. S8). Further reconstruction without imposed symmetry resulted in a 3.2-Å-resolution map that could be fitted with two M3 KS-AT didomains bound to a single Fab molecule (Fig. 2A, fig. S8, and table S1), but neither the ketoreductase (KR) and ACP domains of M1 nor the C-terminal TE domains could be resolved. The single Fab occupancy contrasts with the symmetric binding of two Fab heterodimers observed crystallographically (15), likely because of a bent conformation in the coiled-coil docking domain (detailed in fig. S9). A local resolution range of ~3.2 to 5 Å between the N-terminal docking domain and the AT-KR linker of M3/1 allowed for unambiguous assignment of the extended conformation to its KS-AT didomain (fig. S8). In regions beyond the AT-KR linker, only two low-resolution lobes of density could be observed, which are assumed to be the flexible KR domains because of their domain connectivity (Fig. 2A). We speculated that the invisible KR-ACP-TE segment of this hybrid module might be disordered because of the lack of complementary interactions at its KS:KR interface.
On the basis of the above observations, we next purified DEBS M1 complexed to the same Fab. This module harbors a fully native KS-AT-KR-ACP segment fused to the N-terminal docking domain of M3 and the C-terminal TE domain (for improved expression and solubility). Single-particle cryo-EM analysis of the vitrified M1-Fab complex provided three structurally distinct and asymmetric maps with resolutions ranging from 3.2 to 4.1 Å, each with the expected Q-scores to reflect residue resolvability (figs. S10 to S12) (24). Each map reveals the KS-AT core bound to two Fab copies (fig. S10), as well as additional density for what appears to be one or both KRs. One map includes a clearly resolved ACP, although no features suggest a discernible TE domain.
The best-resolved map of the M1-Fab complex, obtained at 3.2-Å resolution and corresponding to one of the three classes, featured a single KR and a single ACP; this is hereafter referred to as the asymmetric State 1. Further model fitting and real-space refinement revealed an extended, homodimeric KS-AT core, albeit with reduced local resolution at the flanks of both AT domains, which may be altered relative to canonical KS-AT structures defined through x-ray crystallography (Fig. 2B, fig. S11, and table S1). The AT-KR linker could be fully traced to accurately assign the subunit to which the visible KR is attached (Fig. 2B; figs. S12, S13, and S14A; and supplementary text). This KR domain is buttressed by a patch of non-canonically structured KS residues (Asp75 to Arg86; Fig. 2B and fig. S14, A and B). Its orientation is rotated by ~90° compared with our previous low-resolution model of DEBS M3 (17). Interacting residue pairs of the KS: KR intermolecular interface could be accurately visualized (local resolution ~3.2 to 5 Å; Fig. 3, A and B, and figs. S11 and S14B), providing an unprecedented glimpse into quaternary structural interactions between the KS-AT catalytic core and the reductive segment of an assembly-line PKS module. Mapping of the sequences of 300 homologous PKS modules onto the structure of DEBS M1 indicated considerable diversity at this domain-domain interface (fig. S14C) (25). More detailed comparative analysis between the six elongation modules of DEBS and 12 additional modules drawn from the closest homologs of DEBS M1 revealed that the KS:KR interface is more conserved across orthologs of DEBS M1 than other DEBS modules (fig. S15), perhaps reflecting a fitness advantage to the conservation of this interface in modules with shared biosynthetic chemistry. This protein interface also revealed a pronounced electrostatic complementarity (fig. S15E), thereby offering a foothold into structure-based engineering of heterologous KS:KR interfaces. Although previous domain-swapping efforts have exploited variable interdomain linker regions to define heterologous junctions (26-28), no studies to our knowledge have attempted to modify domain-internal residues that comprise the KS:KR interface observed in our State 1 structure.
Perhaps the most noteworthy feature of State 1 is that one of the ACP domains is observed in the KS-AT cleft in a manner consistent with our previous model for polyketide elongation (29, 30). Earlier mutational analysis identified loop 1 residues of the ACP as being the most important for elongation; the same residues comprise the chief ACP contacts in State 1. Interdomain interactions are observed between the ACP and both KS domains of the homodimer as well as the KS-AT linker (fig. S16). Closer inspection of the KS:ACP interface revealed a tunnel of continuous density between the modified Ser (S1449) of the ACP and KS catalytic Cys (C205) separated by ~16 Å, consistent with the 4′-phosphopantetheine (P-pant) cofactor of the ACP embedding into the KS active site (Fig. 3C and fig. S16). Modeling of the P-pant arm and its congruence with the density is supported by Q-score analysis (fig. S12A). In addition to C205, the P-pant thiol is in close proximity to other KS active site residues (i.e., H340, K373, and H378), consistent with placing a 2(S)-methylmalonyl extender unit favorably for catalysis. We therefore propose that State 1 is descriptive of an asynchronously operating elongation mode of a homodimeric PKS module.
Another map, designated State 2, from the same M1-Fab particle dataset was resolved at 4.1-Å resolution and featured both KRs oriented symmetrically about the C2 axis of the homodimeric module. This class was initially fitted from relevant portions of the State 1 structure in addition to a second KR copy (Fig. 2C, figs. S10 and S11, and table S1). Subunit tracing in the State 2 map favors a model in which the KRs interact with the KS of their own subunit, in contrast to the intermolecular KS:KR pairing observed in State 1. Thus, the reductive segment of an assembly-line PKS module must be capable of significant (~180°) C2 rotational motions. Real-space refinement of the State 2 model revealed another notable feature: One of the AT domains is flexed downward relative to the canonical crystallographic structure of the KS-AT core (Fig. 2C and fig. S17A). Unrestrained fitting suggests that the observed flexing of the AT domain hinges on two unstructured linkers, Thr551–Gln555 and Arg860–Ser864 (fig. S17A and movie S1) (31,32), although local resolution at the AT was reduced (fig. S11). This flexing occurs within the boundaries of the AT domain, leaving the KS-AT linker unaltered, a key distinction from the previously reported “arched” conformation of pikromycin synthase module 5 (fig. S17, A and B) (6, 7). Furthermore, this flexing constricts the KS-AT cleft, thereby precluding the ability of the ACP domain to gain access to the KS active site as defined by State 1 (fig. S18) and offering a clue into the structural basis for the experimentally observed gating of the KS (i.e., the turnstile mechanism) (10). Taking a reductionist, two-state-model approach, we therefore postulate that State 2 is descriptive of the translocation and/or transacylation mode of a PKS module (fig. S1).
Although the associated map of the State 1 structure does not resolve the KR-ACP linker with sufficient clarity to identify the subunit to which the structurally defined ACP is attached, we predicted it would be attached to subunit B (colored magenta in Fig. 2B) in accordance with earlier evidence that polyketide chain elongation occurs across subunits (5). To resolve this ambiguity, we further classified the M1 dataset using heterogeneous refinement to identify candidate classes with better structural resolution near the N terminus of the ACP domain. One class average meeting this criterion was selected and further processed to obtain a 4.1-Å-resolution map of M1. This model, hereby designated as State 1′, is reminiscent of State 1 but reveals additional density corresponding to the second KR (figs. S10 to S12 and S19 and table S1). Although the KR and ACP domains are not as well resolved, a continuous region of density can be traced between these two domains, allowing inference of the subunit connectivity of the single ACP domain observed in the higher-resolution State 1 structure (Fig. 2B and fig. S19); in turn, this structural model verifies that polyketide elongation occurs intermolecularly (5). As a corollary, the KR connected to the ACP must undergo significant rotational and translational motion relative to its position in State 2 to position the ACP into its KS-AT cleft for elongation (fig. S19). These findings reinforce the notion that the lower torso region of the module (i.e., C-terminal to the AT) exhibits a high degree of conformational flexibility.
Integrating the above structural data, a model for the catalytic cycle of DEBS M1 emerges with four key features. First, the transition from its translocation and/or transacylation state (State 2) to its elongation state (State 1) requires the flexible KR domain of the homodimeric module to undergo rotational and translational motion. Second, chain elongation requires intermolecular docking of the ACP domain from one subunit onto the KS domain from the other subunit. Third, chain elongation is asynchronously catalyzed by the two KS-ACP pairs of the homodimeric module. Finally, post-elongation “turnstile” closing of M1 involves a conformational change in the KS-AT core that transiently occludes the KS active site from the ACP domain of the upstream loading module to allow the newly formed ACP-bound diketide to undergo β-ketoreduction and be translocated to M2.
To test this model, we prepared DEBS M1 in its diketide-bound form (fig. S1). To prevent chain release, the construct lacked a C-terminal TE domain (see the supplementary materials for details). The resulting protein was complexed with Fab 1B2, incubated with its native substrates for a sufficient duration to complete one catalytic cycle, promptly vitrified, and subjected to cryo-EM analysis. The resulting 4.3-Å-resolution cryo-EM map of the diketide-linked module (Fig. 4A, figs. S20 and S21, and table S1) revealed a distinct structural change in which both AT domains resided in a flexed orientation analogous to the flexed AT observed in State 2 of M1 (Fig. 2C).
As before, the conformation of the flexed ATs in the product-bound state is accompanied by an ~8000-Å3 reduction in the KS-AT cleft volumes, thereby blocking accessibility to acyl-ACP substrates for repeated elongation (fig. S18). Thus, the product-bound state appears to provide a structural rationale for turnstile closing, albeit with modest support from the poorly resolved AT domains (~7.5 Å, Fig. 4B; see fig. S22 and movie S2 for visualization of the map at various thresholds and movie S3 for visualization of turnstile closing). On the basis of this observation, we have therefore assigned the product-bound structure of M1 as the turnstile-closed state. To address whether the turnstile-closed state can support intermodular polyketide translocation, we evaluated two previous models for ACP binding during translocation (Fig. 4C and described in fig. S23). The results from model super-positions are consistent with a KS-AT cleft that is too constricted for ACP entry during translocation, providing an additional layer of support for the structural basis of turnstile closing. The catalytic cycle is summarized in Fig. 4C, and its conformational dynamic aspects are detailed in fig. S24.
At present, hundreds of assembly-line PKSs have been functionally annotated (33), and in silico prediction tools (34-36) are gaining widespread acceptance as more systems are sequenced and characterized (37). Although the elementary reactions of substrate loading and elongation are conserved across each assembly line, frequent reports that defy the DEBS paradigm continue to expand our sense of the enzymology that is possible both on (38) and off (39) the assembly line. Despite these advances, the fundamental question of how assembly-line PKSs coordinate their vectorial biosynthetic chemistry across multiple modules in sequence remains unanswered. A satisfactory answer will require high-resolution spatiotemporal information on PKS modular dynamics.
Supplementary Material
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We thank J. Perrino and D.-H. Chen (Stanford University) for assistance with initial negative-stain and cryo-EM condition screening.
Funding:
This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health (grants R01GM087934 and R35GM141799 to C.K.; grant F32GM136039 to D.P.C.; and grants R01GM079429, P41GM103832, S10OD021600, and U24GM129541 to W.C.).
Footnotes
Competing interests: The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Data and materials availability: All cryo-EM maps and atomic coordinates have been deposited in the Protein Data Bank under accession codes 7M7E, 7M7F, 7M7G, 7M7H, 7M7I, and 7M7J and in the Electron Microscopy Data Bank under accession codes EMD-23710, EMD-23711, EMD-23712, EMD-23713, EMD-23714, and EMD-23715. All other data are present in the main text or the supporting materials.
SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIALS
REFERENCES AND NOTES
- 1.Newman DJ, Cragg GM, J. Nat. Prod 83, 770–803 (2020). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Kirst HA, J. Antibiot. (Tokyo) 63, 101–111 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Robbins T, Liu Y-C, Cane DE, Khosla C, Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol 41, 10–18 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Khosla C, Tang Y, Chen AY, Schnarr NA, Cane DE, Annu. Rev. Biochem 76, 195–221 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Kao CM, Pieper R, Cane DE, Khosla C, Biochemistry 35, 12363–12368 (1996). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Dutta S et al. , Nature 510, 512–517 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Whicher JR et al. , Nature 510, 560–564 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Skiba MA et al. , ACS Chem. Biol 13, 1640–1650 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Wang J et al. , Nat. Commun 12, 867 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Lowry B, Li X, Robbins T, Cane DE, Khosla C, ACS Cent. Sci 2, 14–20 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Chari A et al. , Nat. Methods 12, 859–865 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Gokhale RS, Tsuji SY, Cane DE, Khosla C, Science 284, 482–485 (1999). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Chen AY, Schnarr NA, Kim C-Y, Cane DE, Khosla C, J. Am. Chem. Soc 128, 3067–3074 (2006). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Lowry B et al. , J. Am. Chem. Soc 135, 16809–16812 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Li X et al. , J. Am. Chem. Soc 140, 6518–6521 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Tang Y, Chen AY, Kim C-Y, Cane DE, Khosla C, Chem. Biol 14, 931–943 (2007). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Edwards AL, Matsui T, Weiss TM, Khosla C, J. Mol. Biol 426, 2229–2245 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Tsai SC et al. , Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A 98, 14808–14813 (2001). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Griffin L, Lawson A, Clin. Exp. Immunol 165, 285–291 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Wu S et al. , Structure 20, 582–592 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Cogan DP et al. , J. Am. Chem. Soc 142, 14933–14939 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Keatinge-Clay AT, Stroud RM, Structure 14, 737–748 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Bagde SR, Mathews II, Fromme JC, Kim C-Y, Science 374, 723–729 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Pintilie G et al. , Nat. Methods 17, 328–334 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Ashkenazy H et al. , Nucleic Acids Res. 44, W344–W350 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Klaus M, Grininger M, Nat. Prod. Rep 35, 1070–1081 (2018). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Yuzawa S et al. , ACS Synth. Biol 6, 139–147 (2017). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Hagen A et al. , ACS Synth. Biol 5, 21–27 (2016). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Kapur S, Chen AY, Cane DE, Khosla C, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A 107, 22066–22071 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Kapur S et al. , Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A 109, 4110–4115 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Trabuco LG, Villa E, Mitra K, Frank J, Schulten K, Structure 16, 673–683 (2008). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Trabuco LG, Villa E, Schreiner E, Harrison CB, Schulten K, Methods 49, 174–180 (2009). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Kautsar SA et al. , Nucleic Acids Res. 48 (D1), D454–D458 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Blin K et al. , Nucleic Acids Res. 47 (W1), W81–W87 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Cimermancic P et al. , Cell 158, 412–421 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Skinnider MA, Merwin NJ, Johnston CW, Magarvey NA, Nucleic Acids Res. 45 (W1), W49–W54 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Nivina A, Yuet KP, Hsu J, Khosla C, Chem. Rev 119, 12524–12547 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Keatinge-Clay AT, Chem. Rev 117, 5334–5366 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Helfrich EJN, Piel J, Nat. Prod. Rep 33, 231–316 (2016). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Broadhurst RW, Nietlispach D, Wheatcroft MP, Leadlay PF, Weissman KJ, Chem. Biol 10, 723–731 (2003). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.