Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Feb 14.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Hum Biol. 2020 Nov 14;33(6):e23537. doi: 10.1002/ajhb.23537

Table 2.

Regression analyses for gravidity and biomarkers (oxidative stress and antioxidant defense, 8-OHdG and Cu-Zn SOD).

8-OHdG β Coeff (SE) P value Model R2
Intercept 0 0.004 0.067
Age −0.076 (0.23) 0.387
BMI −0.096 (0.32) 0.140
Marital status −0.038 (4.15) 0.595
Education (years) −0.047 (2.19) 0.572
Menopausal status −0.108 (5.50) 0.155
Smoking 0.029 (5.18) 0.660
Long-term Health Problems −0.048 (3.78) 0.474
Gravidity 0.231 (1.10) 0.008
Rural/urban sample −0.027 (7.61) 0.841
Alcohol use −0.092 (3.77) 0.156
Gravidity * Rural/urban sample −0.120 (2.47) 0.278
Cu-Zn SOD β Coeff (SE) P value Model R2
Intercept 0 <0.001 0.159
Age 0.027 (0.03) 0.766
BMI 0.006 (0.042) 0.925
Marital status −0.070 (0.54) 0.361
Education (years) −0.052 (0.29) 0.560
Menopausal status −0.117 (0.76) 0.146
Smoking −0.050 (0.72) 0.468
Long-term Health Problems −0.004 (0.49) 0.954
Alcohol use −0.071 (0.51) 0.303
Gravidity 0.263 (0.15) 0.006
Rural/urban sample −0.094 (0.97) 0.499
Gravidity * Rural/urban sample −0.188 (0.31) 0.091

8-Oxo-2’-deoxyguanosine;

Copper-zinc superoxide dismutase Presents association between biomarkers and gravidity, possible confounding variables, and residence location. N = 263.