TABLE V. AP(ai)Bias Methodology Based Ranking of the AI Studies for ARDS.

		C1	C2	C3	C4	C5	C6	C7	C8	C9	C10	C11	C12	C13
SN	Author (2020)	Segm. & Class.	CV Protocol	IIV	Bench	CE	LP	DP	Data Size	PE	Innov	Absolute Score	Mean Score	Study Rank
1	Wu et al. [64]	3	2	1	4	3	4	5	3	3	4	32	3.2	1
2	Alberto et al. [71]	1	2	4	1	4	3	5	5	2	3	30	3	2
3	Ouchicha et al. [58]	3	3	0	5	4	4	0	2	3	5	29	2.9	3
4	Ozturk et al. [59]	4	3	0	5	3	5	0	2	2	4	28	2.8	4
5	Khan et al. [49]	3	3	0	4	4.5	5	3	2	2	0	26.5	2.7	5
6	Yasar et al. [66]	2	2	0	3	4	5	4	3	3	0	26	2.6	6
7	Gunraj et al. [79]	3	0	0	2	3	5	0	5	3	4	25	2.5	7
8	Li et al. [81]	3	3	1	0	3	5	1	3	1	4	24	2.4	8
9	Wang et al. [80]	3	0	3	2	3	5	0	5	2	0	23	2.3	9
10	Altan et al. [43]	3	0	0	2	3	5	5	2	3	0	23	2.3	10
11	Das et al. [46]	3	0	0	5	4	5	0	2	3	1	23	2.3	11
12	Hwang et al. [47]	2	1	4	2	4	5	0	5	0	0	23	2.3	12
13	Jaiswal et al. [75]	2	0	0	0	3	5	4	5	3	0	22	2.2	13
14	Tsiknakis et al. [77]	3	3	0	0	2.5	5	1	5	1	0	20.5	2.1	14
15	Matthew et al. [37]	3	0	1	0	2.5	5	5	4	0	0	20.5	2.1	15
16	Tuncer et al. [62]	2	1	0	0	0	5	3	1	3	5	20	2	16
17	Tang et al. [73]	2	2	0	0	4.5	5	0	2	1	3	19.5	2	17
18	Ismael et al. [48]	2	2	3	0	4.5	5	0	1	2	0	19.5	2	18
19	Carrer et al. [45]	2	0	0	3	4	5	0	3	2	0	19	1.9	19

^*Segm: Segmentation; class: Classification; IIV: Intra- and inter-variability; Innov: Innovation; Bench: Benchmarking; PE: Performance evaluation; CE: Clinical Evaluation; LP: Learning Paradigm; DP: Data Preparation