Table 1. Pearson correlation coefficient analysis between TST and FST, TST and OFT, and FST and TST.
Figure | Test | Sample numbers | Comparison | Coefficient (r) | p value | Significance |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Figure 2J-L | Effects of excitation of crus I PCs on RS | 119 | TST vs FST | 0.464 | 1.17 × 10–7 | *** |
TST vs OFT | 0.153 | 0.0961 | ||||
FST vs OFT | 0.0303 | 0.743 | ||||
Figure 6B-D | Effects of inhibition of VTA-projecting DCN neurons on RS | 116 | TST vs FST | 0.327 | 3.42 × 10–4 | *** |
TST vs OFT | –0.119 | 0.204 | ||||
FST vs OFT | 0.0474 | 0.0613 | ||||
Figure 7B-D | Only excitation of VTA-projecting DCN neurons | 70 | TST vs FST | 0.439 | 1.43 × 10–4 | *** |
TST vs OFT | –0.0308 | 0.8 | ||||
FST vs OFT | –0.0143 | 0.907 |