Skip to main content
. 2021 Sep 4;100(3):351–372. doi: 10.1007/s00109-021-02131-w

Table 2.

Prognostic association of high SAMHD1 expression level in 17 major cancer types

P-values Prognosis Cancer type
0.007 Favorable Cervical cancer
0.016 Favorable Colorectal cancer
0.019 Favorable Head and neck cancer
0.032 Favorable Thyroid cancer
0.038 Favorable Endometrial cancer
0.041 Favorable Lung cancer
0.104 Favorable Prostate cancer
0.109 Favorable Breast cancer
0.128 Favorable Glioma
0.203 Favorable Melanoma
0.001 Unfavorable Renal cancer
0.027 Unfavorable Urothelial cancer
0.091 Unfavorable Testis cancer
0.144 Unfavorable Stomach cancer
0.188 Unfavorable Pancreatic cancer
0.215 Unfavorable Liver cancer
0.363 Unfavorable Ovarian cancer

Results of the study [107] were used to compile the table depicting the prognostic association of SAMHD1 expression level in reported cancers. In the study, the transcriptomes of 17 major cancer types were analyzed with respect to clinical outcome to explore the prognostic role of each protein-coding gene in each cancer type. For each gene and cancer type, the patient cohort was stratified into two groups based on individual expression levels. The data included transcript expression levels summarized per gene (fragments per kilobase of exon per million mapped reads — FPKMs) in 7932 samples from 17 different cancer types. To choose the best FPKM cutoffs for grouping the patients for SAMHD1 most significantly, all FPKM values from the 20th to 80th percentiles were used here in testing for differences in the survival outcomes of the groups, and the FPKM value yielding the lowest log-rank P value was selected. Two types of prognostic genes affecting patient survival were defined: (i) SAMHD1 as an unfavorable prognostic gene, for which higher expression was correlated with a poor patient survival outcome, and (ii) SAMHD1 as a favorable prognostic gene, for which higher expression was correlated with a longer survival