Skip to main content
. 2021 Mar 18;227(2):479–496. doi: 10.1007/s00429-021-02256-1

Table 2.

Studies investigating hemispheric asymmetries in foetuses during pregnancy

Structural asymmetries in the gestational period
Authors, year Technique Age at recording Participant number Study design
Hering-Hanit et al. (2001) US 20–22 GA 102 Right/left within-subjects comparison
Kivilevitch et al. (2010) US 19–28 GA 406 Right/left within-subjects comparison
Kasprian et al. (2011) 1.5 T MRI 18–37 GA 197

Right/left within-subjects comparison

Age between-subjects comparison

Rajagopalan et al. (2011) 1.5 T MRI 20–28 GA 38

Right/left within-subjects comparison

Age between-subjects comparison

Scott et al. (2011) 1.5 T MRI 20.57–31.14 GA 39

Right/left within-subjects comparison

Age between-subjects comparison

Habas et al. (2012) 1.5 T MRI 20–28 GA 38

Right/left within-subjects comparison

Age between-subjects comparison

Rajagopalan et al. (2012) Tensor-based morphometry 20.57–27.86 GA 38 (40 scans)

Right/left within-subjects comparison

Age between-subjects comparison

Song et al. (2015) 3 T MRI HARDI 15 GA–3 years 23 (11 post-mortems, 12 foetuses)

Right/left within-subjects comparison

Age between-subjects comparison

Andescavage et al. (2017) 1.5 T MRI 18–39 GA 166

Right/left within-subjects comparison

Age between-subjects comparison

Vasung et al. (2019) 3 T MRI 16.43–36.86 GA 42 Right/left within-subjects comparison
Functional asymmetries in the gestational period
Schleussner et al. (2004)

MEG

500 Hz

3rd trimester 38 (53 scans) Right/left within-subjects comparison

GA gestational age, HARDI high-angular resolution diffusion, MEG magnetoencephalography, MRI magnetic resonance imaging, US ultrasound sonography