Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: Hepatology. 2022 Jan 18;75(3):740–753. doi: 10.1002/hep.32284

Table 1.

Potential steps to mitigate overdiagnosis in HCC surveillance

Method Example
Target screening to the at-risk population AASLD and EASL guidelines recommend HCC surveillance in at risk populations (i.e., cirrhosis and select individuals with hepatitis B infection) and against routine screening in non-cirrhotic NAFLD or hepatitis C infection
Risk stratification biomarkers may facilitate precision/tailored surveillance according to individual patient risk in the future
Avoid screening in patients with high competing risks of mortality AASLD and EASL guidelines recommend avoiding HCC surveillance in patients with significant liver dysfunction (e.g., Child Pugh C cirrhosis) and those with high comorbidity
Appropriate frequency of screening AASLD and EASL guidelines recommend HCC surveillance with ultrasound +/- AFP every 6 months (shorter intervals result in increased overdiagnosis)
Avoid screening and diagnostic tests that have high potential for overdiagnosis AASLD and EASL guidelines recommend ultrasound instead of routine use of CT or MRI for surveillance
Emerging early detection biomarkers may preserve high sensitivity for early HCC while reducing potential for overdiagnosis
Adhere to guideline recommendations for recall procedures AASLD and EASL guidelines recommend repeat short-interval ultrasound in patients with sub-centimeter lesions and perform diagnostic imaging for those with lesions ≥1 cm and those with elevated AFP levels.
Strictly apply diagnostic criteria AASLD and EASL guidelines recommend strict radiologic criteria (e.g., LI-RADS) for HCC diagnosis and using biopsy in cases where diagnosis is uncertain and LI-RADS has not been validated (e.g., non-cirrhosis, cardiac cirrhosis)
AASLD and EASL guidelines recommend multidisciplinary discussion for patients with LR-4 observations and recommend against routine treatment
Assess tumor biology and identify indolent tumors that may not require treatment Novel prognostic biomarkers and radiomics may help distinguish indolent versus aggressive HCC
Inform patients of the possibility of overdiagnosis, the balance of benefits and harms and enable shared decision making Discuss benefits and harms of various HCC surveillance modalities according to the patient’s individual risk
Counsel patients on the potential outcomes and limitations of surveillance tests