Table 1.
Author/Year | Study Type | # of Subjects | Indications | Injection Technique/Location | Dosing | Results | Reported Side Effects |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Girard et al. (2018) | Non-randomized, prosepective, intervention study | 42 patients; 65 lacrimal glands; 18 males/24 females; Mean age 65 years | • Paroxysmal lacrimal hypersection (n = 56, 86%)• Aberrant 7th nerve regeneration (n = 2, 3%)• Facial palsies (n = 7, 11%) | Incobotulinum toxin A; transconjunctival direct injection into palpebral lobe of lacrimal gland | Mean 4.9 Units; Range 2–10 units; Re-injections (n = 39, 60%) | Munk Score mean reduction 2.68; Schirmer mean reduction of 9 mm; QoL questionnaire 88% (n = 37) satisfaction; epiphora resolution in 21% (n = 9) after first injection | • ptosis (n = 2, 3%)• diplopia (n = 6, 9%)• lacrimal gland hematoma (n = 2, 3%) |
Shan et al. (2019) | Randomized, prospective, intervention study | 15 patients; 4 males/11 females; mean age 38 years | • Submandibular gland transplantation c/b epiphora (n = 15, 100%) | Onabotulinum toxin A; Percutaneous injection into transplanted submandibular gland | 3 groups of 5; 15, 20, & 25 Units; No re-injections reported | Schirmer mean reduction 64/73/78% respectively; VAS (visual analogue scale) Scores decreased in 20&25 Unit groups through 6 months | • None reported |
Keegan et al. (2002) | Non-randomized, prospective, intervention study | 4 patients; 3 males/1 female; age range 20–58 | • Aberrant 7th nerve regeneration (n = 3, 75%)• Submandibular gland transplant (n = 1, 25%) | Abobotulinum toxin A; Transcutaneous lacrimal gland injection (n = 3, 75%); Subcutaneous injection near transplanted submandibular gland (n = 1, 25%) | 20 Units in 3 divided doses; 1000–1200 units for submandibular injection; re-injections (n = 2, 50%) | Schirmer improvement (n = 3, 75%); subjective improvement (n = 3, 75%) | • ptosis (n = 2, 50%)• diplopia (n = 1, 25%) |
Nava-Castañeda et al. (2006) | Non-randomized, prospective, intervention study | 15 patients; 15 lacrimal glands; 8 males/7 females; mean age 63 years | • Gustatory epiphora (n = 15, 100%) | Onabotulinum toxin A; transconjunctival direct injection into palpebral lobe of lacrimal gland | 2.5 Units; no re-injections reported | Schirmer test mean decrease 5.4 mm; statistically significant at 24 weeks in affected eyes | • ptosis (n = 2, 13%) |
Whittaker et al. (2003) | Non-randomized, retrospective, intervention study | 14 patients; 5 males/9 females; Mean age 60 years | • Functional epiphora (n = 14, 100%) | Onabotulinum toxin A; transconjunctival direct injection into palpebral lobe of lacrimal gland | 2.5–5 Units; re-inections (n = 2, 14%) | Pt reported symptom improvement @ 1 week (n = 10, 71%); @ 13 weeks (n = 8, 73%); Schirmer test value improvement @ 1 week (n = 11, 79%); @ 13 weeks (n = 6, 55%) | • ptosis (n = 1, 7%)• diplopia (n = 1, 7%) |
Hofmann (2000) | Non-randomized, retrospective, intervention study | • 2 patients | • Aberrant 7th nerve regeneration (n = 2, 100%) | Onabotulinum toxin A; transconjunctival direct injection into palpebral lobe of lacrimal gland | 15 Units – 3 injections of 5 units each, 2 laterally subcutaneous and 1 transconjunctival glandular injection; re-injections (n = 2, 100%) | Pt reported symptom improvement; observed lack of gustatory epiphora | • None reported |
Montoya et al. (2002) | Non-randomized, prospective, intervention study | • 4 patients; Mean age 57 years (range 35–75) | • Gustatory hyperlacrimation (n = 4, 100%) | Abobotulinum toxin A; transcutaneous (n = 3, 75%), transconjunctival (n = 1, 25%) direct injection into lacrimal gland | 10 Units; re-injections (n = 3, 75%) | Pt reported symptom improvement (n = 4, 100%); Schirmer decrease @ 6 months (n = 4, 100%) | • ptosis (n = 1, 25%)• DES (n = 3, 75%) |