Skip to main content
. 2022 Feb 14;13:867. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-28476-5

Table 1.

Comparison of CO2 Conversion Rate and CO Selectivity for the as-prepared and Literature Reported catalysts.

Catalyst H2:CO2 Temperature (°C) Pressure (MPa) Rate (10‒5molCO2/gcat/s) CO selectivity (%) Ref
15CuCe 3:1 600 0.1 146.6 100 this work
15CuAl 3:1 600 0.1 3.0 100 this work
Cu/CeO2‒hs 3:1 600 0.1 42.5 100 46
4Cu‒Al2O3 2:1 600 0.1 17.9 100 13
Cu/β‒Mo2C 2:1 600 0.1 47.7 99.2 14
Cu-Fe/SiO2 1:1 600 0.1 11.9 100 20
NiCe/Zr 3:1 550 0.1 33.3 99.5 48
15CuCe 3:1 500 0.1 52.2 100 this work
In2O3‒CeO2 1:1 500 0.1 2.98 100 49
K80‒Pt/L 1:1 500 0.1 2.22 100 22
Ni‒in‒Cu 3:1 500 0.1 3.95 100 50
CuSiO/CuOx 3:1 500 0.1 3.18 100 51
TiO2/Cu 3:1 500 0.1 1.78 N/A 51
SiO2/Cu 3:1 500 0.1 1.11 N/A 51
Cu‒Zn‒Al 2:1 500 0.1 26.1 100 14
Cu/β‒Mo2C 2:1 500 0.1 37.9 99.0 14
Pt/TiO2 1:1 400 0.1 5.0 100 52
Pt/Al2O3 1.4:1 400 N/A 0.16 N/A 53
Ni/Mg(Al)O 3:1 450 0.1 0.5 66.7 54
Fe-CeO2 4:1 400 0.1 0.65 100 55