Skip to main content
. 2022 Feb 8;62:103–113. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2022.02.004

Table 1.

Data from the 24 included randomized controlled trials included in this systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Author Year Country Trial Number Total (N) Breast (N) Intervention (vs. WGL)
Postma 2012 Netherlands NCT00539474 314 316 ROLL
Duarte 2016 Columbia C41030610-019 129 129 ROLL
Medina-Franco 2008 Mexico 100 100 ROLL
Rampaul 2004 UK 93 93 ROLL
Martinez 2009 Spain 134 134 ROLL
Ocal 2011 Turkey 108 108 ROLL
Moreno 2008 Brazil 120 120 ROLL
Kanat 2016 Turkey 36 36 ROLL
Alikhassi* 2016 Iran 60 60 ROLL
Tang 2011 China 157 157 ROLL + Dye
Langhans 2017 Denmark R72-A4701–13-S9 409 413 RSL
Taylor 2021 Australia ACTRN12613000655741 659 664 RSL
Bloomquist 2015 USA 125 125 RSL
Lovrics 2011 Canada NCT00225927 305 305 RSL
Parvez 2014 Canada 73 73 RSL
Gray 2001 USA 97 97 RSL
Rahusen 2002 Netherlands 49 49 USGL
Hoffman 2019 Germany NCT02222675 47 47 USGL
Hu 2020 China 520 520 USGL
Tafra 2016 USA 320 320 CAL
Struik 2021 Netherlands NL6553 67 67 ML
Tong 2019 China 62 62 IL
Israel 2002 USA 114 114 AGL
Barth Jr. 2019 USA NCT01929395 137 137 SMRI

N; Number, WGL; wire-guided localization, ROLL; radio-guided occult lesion localization, RSL; radioactive seed localization, USGL; ultrasound-guided localization, CAL; cryo-assisted localization, ML; magnetic-marker localization, IL; indocyanine green fluorescence-guided lumpectomy, AGL; anchor-guided localization.

SMRI; intraoperative supine magnetic resonance imaging, UK; United Kingdom, USA United States of America.

*Incalculable at meta-analyses results reporting no positive results for the primary outcome of interest.