Skip to main content
. 2022 Feb 9;39(4):317–324. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2021-211934

Table 2.

Triage tool diagnostic accuracy statistics (95% CI) for predicting any adverse outcome

Tool N* n (%) adverse outcome† C-statistic Threshold n (%) above threshold Sensitivity Specificity PPV NPV
CRB-65 7469 1315 (18) 0.79
(0.78 to 0.80)
>0 4010 (54) 0.89
(0.88 to 0.89)
0.54
(0.53 to 0.54)
0.29
(0.29 to 0.30)
0.96
(0.95 to 0.96)
NEWS2 7433 1315 (18) 0.80
(0.78 to 0.81)
>1 5574 (75) 0.96
(0.96 to 0.96)
0.30
(0.29 to 0.30)
0.23
(0.22 to 0.23)
0.97
(0.97 to 0.97)
PMEWS 7460 1315 (18) 0.81
(0.80 to 0.83)
>2 5352 (72) 0.98
(0.97 to 0.98)
0.34
(0.33 to 0.34)
0.24
(0.24 to 0.24)
0.99
(0.98 to 0.99)
PRIEST 7471 1315 (18) 0.83
(0.82 to 0.84)
>4 4932 (66) 0.97
(0.97 to 0.97)
0.41
(0.40 to 0.41)
0.26
(0.25 to 0.26)
0.98
(0.98 to 0.99)
WHO 7471 1315 (18) 0.64
(0.64 to 0.65)
>0 5539 (74) 0.98
(0.97 to 0.98)
0.31
(0.30 to 0.31)
0.23
(0.23 to 0.24)
0.98
(0.98 to 0.99)

*Patients with less than three parameters were excluded from analysis when estimating performance.

†Totals rounded to nearest 5.

NEWS2, National Early Warning Score, version 2; NPV, negative predictive value; PPV, positive predictive value.