Skip to main content
. 2022 Feb 11;12(2):e047639. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-047639

Table 1.

Integrated evaluation framework

Model components Definitions
External environment External motivators External factors that stimulate the organisation to focus on the QI project.
Project sponsorship External entities contributing personnel, expertise, equipment, facilities or other resources for the project.
Organisation QI leadership Senior leadership commitment to champion and support QI project.
Senior leader project sponsor
Culture supportive of QI Values, beliefs and norms of an organisation that shape the behaviours of staff in pursuing QI.
Maturity of organisational QI Sophistication of the organisation’s QI programmes.
Staff engagement Steps taken by the organisation for continued staff engagement in QI.
QI support and capacity Data infrastructure Extent to which a system exists to collect, manage and facilitate the use of data.
Effective use of technology.
Resource availability Support for QI, including allocation of resources, finances and staff time.
Workforce focus on QI Workforce development through training and engagement in QI.
QI team and microsystem Team diversity Diversity of team members with respect to professional discipline, personality, motivation and perspective.
Physician involvement Contribution of physicians to the QI team efforts.
Subject matter expert Team member/members knowledgeable about measurement.
Prior QI experience Prior experience with QI.
Team leadership Team leader’s ability to accomplish the goals of the improvement project by guiding the QI team.
Team norms Team establishes strong norms of behaviour about QI goal achievement.
Team QI skill/capability for improvement Team’s ability to use improvement methods to make changes.
Motivation to change Extent to which team members have a desire and willingness to improve.
QI accountability Clearly stated and communicated responsibility and accountability in the project.
Trigger (training event) Participation and reaction (Kirkpatrick level 1) Overall satisfaction with the programme, content, delivery, logistics, facilitators, etc.
Knowledge, skills and attitudes (Kirkpatrick level 2) Improvement in knowledge and skills reported by participants immediately after the intervention.
Outcomes/process and system changes Behaviour change (Kirkpatrick level 3) Confidence in measurement skills.
Maintaining and advancing the skills learnt.
Continued spread and involvement in QI.
Learning networks Development of QI networks among postintervention.
QI capacity development Ability of participants to initiate and lead other projects.
Ability of participants to train/help other staff.
Change in organisational practice and/or patient outcomes (Kirkpatrick level 4) Sustainability in outcomes achieved.
Sustainability in practices.
Process changes as a result of the training event.
Dissemination/spread Spread of knowledge and improved practices to non-intervention units.
Unintended consequences Negative or positive unanticipated outcomes.

QI, quality improvement.