Skip to main content
. 2022 Feb 15;22:39. doi: 10.1186/s12911-022-01774-0

Table 2.

Performance comparison on the test dataset

Method Estimated mortality Jaccard
Trajectory-wise State-wise
Clinician’s policy 0.0956 0.0959
Dual-LSTM 0.0887 0.0935 0.3171
AMANet 0.0827 0.0895 0.3250
DPO-LSTM 0.0919 0.0930 0.2069
SRL-Multimorbidity 0.0948 0.0953 0.2610
SL-LSTM (ε=0) 0.0956 0.0967 0.3432
RL-LSTM (ε=1.0) 0.0752 0.0721 0.0342
SRL-LSTM (ε=0.4) 0.0643 0.0878 0.3110
SRL-LSTM(ε=0.4, w/o diagnosis codes) 0.0741 0.086 0.2233

The bold indicates the prefered AI model to learn dynamic treatment strategies for CHD patients