Table 4.
Journal | n | Median | IQR | Range | P value | |
Consent rate (percentage of eligible participants consented and randomised) | All | 309 | 72% | 50%–88% | 4%–100% | |
HTA | 230 | 72% | 50%–88% | 4%–100% | 0.225* | |
EME | 36 | 74% | 52%–93% | 11%–100% | ||
PGfAR | 30 | 65% | 48%–84% | 19%–100% | ||
HS&DR | 7 | 81% | 60%–97% | 35%–100% | ||
PHR | 6 | 57% | 40%–68% | 35%–76% | ||
Recruitment rate (participants recruited per centre per month) | All | 365 | 0.95 | 0.42–2.60 | 0.01–57.75 | |
HTA | 289 | 0.85 | 0.39–2.49 | 0.01–57.75 | 0.010* | |
EME | 39 | 1.18 | 0.45–2.46 | 0.15–18.61 | ||
PGfAR | 25 | 1.18 | 0.53–2.80 | 0.07–24.03 | ||
HS&DR | 6 | 1.88 | 1.71–10.82 | 1.69–18.87 | ||
PHR | 6 | 7.62 | 1.79–17.06 | 1.69–20.57 | ||
Retention rate (percentage of randomised participants retained and assessed in primary outcome) | All | 388 | 88% | 80%–97% | 0%–100% | |
HTA | 303 | 89% | 80%–97% | 0%–100% | 0.118* | |
EME | 39 | 89% | 80%–97% | 47%–100% | ||
PGfAR | 31 | 84% | 78%–91% | 43%–100% | ||
HS&DR | 9 | 82% | 73%–89% | 68%–99% | ||
PHR | 6 | 85% | 78%–90% | 74%–92% |
*P values are reported from a Kruskal-Wallis test.
EME, efficacy and mechanism evaluation; HS&DR, Health Services and Delivery Research; HTA, Health Technology Assessment; PGfAR, Programme Grants for Applied Research; PHR, Public Health Research.