Skip to main content
. 2022 Feb 14;12(2):e059230. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-059230

Table 7.

Comparison of the current review with three previous reviews in terms of successful recruitment to target sample size and extensions to recruitment

Review McDonald et al7 Sully et al5 Walters et al8 This study This study
Recruitment period 1994–2002 2002–2008 2004–2016 2017–2020 1997–2020
No of trials in the study N=122 N=73 N=151 N=174 N=388
Recruited 100% of original target 38 of 122 (31%) 40 of 73 (55%) 61 of 151 (40%) 107 of 174 (61%) 207 of 388 (53%)
Original target was revised 42 of 122 (34%) 14 of 73 (19%) 52 of 151 (34%) 54 of 174 (31%) 118 of 388 (30%)
Original target revised upward 6 of 42 (14%) 5 of 14 (36%) 11 of 52 (21%) 23 of 54 (43%) 39 of 118 (33%)
Original target revised downward 36 of 42 (86%) 9 of 14 (64%) 41 of 52 (79%) 31 of 54 (57%) 79 of 118 (67%)
Recruited 80% of original target 67 of 122 (55%) 57 of 73 (78%) 95 of 151 (63%) 139 of 174 (80%) 288 of 388 (74%)
Recruited 100% of revised target 19 of 42 (45%) 10 of 14 (71%) 28 of 52 (54%) 35 of 54 (65%) 80 of 118 (68%)
Recruited 80% of revised target 34 of 42 (80%) 13 of 14 (93%) 48 of 52 (92%) 48 of 54 (89%) 107 of 118 (91%)
Extended their recruitment 65 of 122 (54%) 33 of 73 (45%) 49 of 151 (32%) 65 of 174 (37%) 128 of 388 (33%)