Skip to main content
. 2022 Feb 15;22:204. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-07576-4

Table 1.

Type of FIT/FOBT and Reported Costs from 84 Practice Respondents

Kit Name N* % Unknown cost, N Free, N* Purchase kits
Known Cost, N Median ($) Min. Max.
Hemosure® One-Step iFOBT Test (Hemosure, Inc) 25 (30) 8 6 10a 3.43 0.83 6.41
OC Auto® FIT** (Polymedco) 16 (19) 10 4 2 1.57 1.13 2.00
Insure® FIT (Clinical Genomics) 11 (13) 5 2 3 2.32 1.70 6.00
Hemoccult-ICT® (Beckman Coulter) 10 (12) 7 0 1b 0.99 0.99 0.99
OC-Light® iFOBT Test** (Polymedco) 9 (11) 6 2 1 1.50
McKesson Consult® FOBT 3 (4) 0 1 2 3.44 0.88 6.00
Seracult® 2 (2) 1 0 1 2.13
QuickVue® iFOBT (Quidell) 2 (2) 2 0 0
Lochness Medical® 1 (1) 0 0 1 5.00
Rapid Response® FIT (BTNX Inc.) 1 (1) 0 0 1 3.75
HemaPrompt® 1 (1) 0 0 1 1.41
Unknown 11 (13) 11 0 0
Overall 84 (100) 44 13 27 3.04 0.83 6.41

aOne outlier ($18.40) omitted, and b: Two outliers ($17.00 and $30.00 omitted); as detailed in “Methods” these responses likely include processing or are the cost per box rather than cost per unit

*Note that FIT numbers do not add to the total because clinics could report multiple FIT types

**USPSTF evidence review identified this FIT with adequate data to support high sensitivity and specificity