Skip to main content
. 2021 Sep 27;13(2):262–270. doi: 10.1111/jdi.13658

Table 1.

Summary of findings

Outcomes Anticipated absolute effects (95% CI) Relative effect (95% CI) No. participants (studies) Quality of the evidence (GRADE)
Risk with control Risk with ACT
HbA1c Mean HbA1c change ranged from 7.81 to 8.07 MD −0.62 lower (−1.07 lower to −0.16 lower) 232 (3 RCTs)

⨁⨁⊖⊖

LOW

SDSCA Mean SDSCA change was 54.08 MD 8.48 higher (2.16 higher to 14.8 higher) 100 (1 RCTs)

⨁⨁⨁⨁

HIGH

Adverse events
AADQ Mean AADQ change ranged from 48.43 to 76.42 MD 5.98 higher (1.42 higher to 10.54 higher) 231 (3 RCTs)

⨁⨁⊖⊖

LOW , §

AADQ, acceptance and action diabetes questionnaire; CI, confidence interval; HbA1c, glycated hemoglobin; MD, mean difference; SDSCA, summary of diabetes self‐care activities.

The risk in the intervention group (and its 95% confidence interval) was based on the assumed risk in the comparison group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its 95% CI).

Participants were not blinded.

§

The intervention methods were complex.