Skip to main content
Springer logoLink to Springer
. 2021 Dec 11;20(2):283. doi: 10.1007/s40258-021-00708-7

Correction to: Cost-Utility Analysis of Discontinuing Antidepressants in England Primary Care Patients Compared with Long-Term Maintenance: The ANTLER Study

Caroline S Clarke 1,, Larisa Duffy 2, Glyn Lewis 2, Nick Freemantle 3, Simon Gilbody 4, Tony Kendrick 5, David Kessler 6, Michael King 2, Paul Lanham 7, Derelie Mangin 8, Michael Moore 5, Irwin Nazareth 1, Nicola Wiles 9, Louise Marston 1, Rachael Maree Hunter 1
PMCID: PMC8847289  PMID: 34893957

Correction to: Applied Health Economics and Health Policy 10.1007/s40258-021-00693-x

In this article the text in Sect. 3.2 and the legend for Fig. 1 has been published with inadvertent errors.

The final sentence of Sect. 3.2, which previously read as

“The trend in utilities can also be seen in Fig. 1, which shows the mean adjusted imputed utility scores at each time point for the three different methods of calculating utilities.”

Should read as

“The trend in utilities can also be seen in Fig. 1, which shows the mean unadjusted complete-case utility scores at each time point for the three different methods of calculating utilities.”

The legend to Fig. 1, which previously read as

“Fig. 1 Adjusted imputed mean utility scores at each timepoint, by arm, for each of the three methods: EQ-5D-5L VSE, EQ-5D-5L crosswalk and SF-12/SF-6D. SF-12 12-Item Short-Form survey, VSE value set for England”

Should read as

“Fig. 1 Unadjusted complete-case mean utility scores at each timepoint, by arm, for each of the three methods: EQ-5D-5L VSE, EQ-5D-5L crosswalk and SF-12/SF-6D. SF-12 12-Item Short-Form survey, VSE value set for England”

The original article has been corrected.


Articles from Applied Health Economics and Health Policy are provided here courtesy of Springer

RESOURCES