Skip to main content
. 2021 Jul 7;34(2):289–307. doi: 10.1007/s40520-021-01930-y

Table 1.

Summary of included articles providing cross-sectional data

Authors Country Samples characteristics Main assessment Main outcome variable/s Results
Visuospatial Working Memory (n = 16)
 Alichniewicz et al. (2012) [25] Regensburg (Germany) 39 aMCI, 24 HCs N-Back Task Judgment accuracy HCs > MCI
Reaction time HCs = MCI
 Blatt et al. (2014) [26] Magdeburg (Germany) 18 aMCI, 25 HCs Task description: subjects had to remember the location of vertical bars and ignore horizontal bars Storage ability HCs = MCI
Filtering ability HCs > MCI
 Caffò et al. (2012) [27] Bari (Italy) 51 aMCI, 53 HCs Reorientation paradigm Number of attempts HCs > MCI
 de Rover et al. (2011) [28] Cambridge (UK) 15 aMCI, 16 HCs CANTAB-PAL Test Recall accuracy HCs > MCI
 Elosúa et al. (2017) [29] Madrid (Spain) 30 AD, 30 MCI [NOS], 30 HCs Forward CBT (with inhibition) Recall accuracy HCs > MCI, HCs > AD
 Kessels et al. (2010) [30] Nijmegen (Netherlands) 15 aMCI, 25 HCs Box task Within-search errors HCs = MCI
Between-search errors HCs > MCI
 Kessels et al. (2015) [31] Nijmegen (Netherlands) 14 AD, 11 MCI [NOS], 25 HCs Backward CBT Recall accuracy HCs > MCI = AD
 Kochan et al. (2010) [17] Sydney (Australia) 35 MCI [NOS], 22 HCs DMS task Recall accuracy HCs = MCI
Reaction time HCs = MCI
 Lou et al. (2015) [32] Hong Kong (China) 17 aMCI, 19 HCs DMS task Recall accuracy HCs > MCI
Reaction time HCs = MCI
 Maki et al. (2010) [33] Maebashi (Japan) 27 PwD (18 AD, 6 LBD, 3 NOS), 10 MCI, 29 HCs Numerical memory span task Recall accuracy HCs > MCI > PwD
 Mitolo et al. (2013) [34] Padua (Italy) 20 MCI [NOS], 14 HCs OLRT Accuracy in object recall and positioning HCs > MCI
MLT Difference between observed and correct responses HCs > MCI
 Moodley et al. (2015) [35] Haywards Heath (UK) 11 AD, 21 MCI [NOS], 20 HCs 4MT Allocentric spatial memory HCs > MCI > AD
 Moodley et al. (2015) [35] Milan (Italy) 9 AD, 14 MCI [NOS], 10 HCs 4MT Allocentric spatial memory HCs > MCI, HCs > AD, MCI = AD
 Ruggiero et al. (2018) [36] Naples (Italy) 8 AD, 11 aMCI, 19 HCs EAT Egocentric memory HCs > AD, HCs = MCI, MCI = AD
Allocentric memory HCs > MCI, HCs > AD
Egocentric-allocentric switching HCs > AD, HCs = MCI, MCI = AD
Allocentric-egocentric switching HCs > MCI, HCs > AD
 Ruggiero et al. (2020) [37] Naples (Italy) 8 AD, 10 aMCI, 20 HCs EAT Egocentric-categorical memory HCs = MCI, HCs > AD, MCI = AD
Egocentric-coordinate memory HCs = MCI > AD
Allocentric-categorical memory HCs = MCI > AD
Allocentric-coordinate memory HCs > MCI = AD
 Ung et al. (2020) [38] Perak (Malaysia) 18 AD, 12 MCI [NOS], 31 HCs VWMT Recall accuracy HCs = MCI > AD
 Wiechmann et al. (2011) [39] Fort Worth (USA) 261 AD, 107 VaD, 55 aMCI, 71 naMCI, 44 HCs Backward CBT Recall accuracy HCs > VaD, HCs > AD, HCs = aMCI = naMCI, aMCI > AD, naMCI > AD, naMCI > VaD
Awareness of Memory Deficits (n = 12)
 Chudoba & Schmitter-Edgecombe (2020) [40] Washington (USA) 26 aMCI, 26 HCs Study and recall of words from a 12-word list OJD HCs = MCI
 Clare et al. (2013) [41] Bangor (UK) 99 PwD (AD, VaD, AD + VaD), 30 MCI (aMCI and aMCI-md) MARS-MFS SRD MCI = PwD
MARS-MPS/RBMT SRD + OJD MCI > PwD
 Coutinho et al. (2016) [42]

Rio de

Janeiro (Brazil)

22 MCI (aMCI and aMCI-md), 25 HCs RAVLT (5th trial) vs MAC-Q Discrepancy between objective and subjective memory measures HCs = MCI
 Fragkiadaki et al. (2016) [43] Athens (Greece) 35 aMCI, 35 HCs HVLT-Delayed Recall OJD HCs > MCI
BVMT-Delayed Recall OJD HCs > MCI
 Galeone et al. (2011) [44] Naples (Italy) 15 AD, 25 aMCI, 21 HCs AMIS SRD HCs > MCI = AD
Study and recall of words from three 10-word lists OJD HCs > MCI = AD
 Lehrner et al. (2015) [45] Vienna (Austria) 43 AD, 137 aMCI, 181 naMCI, 211 HCs FAI vs VRST-delayed recall Discrepancy between objective and subjective memory measures HCs > naMCI > aMCI > AD
 Oba et al. (2018) [46] Kyoto (Japan) 118 AD, 47 aMCI, 17 HCs Questionnaire on anosognosia for memory impairment SRD HCs > MCI > AD
 Ryu et al. (2020) [47] Seoul (Republic of Korea) 49 AD, 51 MCI [NOS] SMCQ SRD MCI = AD
 Seelye et al. (2010) [48] Pullman (USA) 27 aMCI, 14 naMCI, 41 HCs RAVLT-delayed recall OJD HCs = aMCI = naMCI
 Tondelli et al. (2018) [49] Modena (Italy) 12 AD, 15 aMCI RAVLT-Delayed Recall OJD MCI > AD
ROCF-Delayed Recall OJD MCI > AD
 Vannini et al. (2017) [50] Boston (USA) 31 MCI (aMCI and aMCI-md), 251 HCs Logical Memory-delayed recall (WMS-R) vs MFQ-general frequency of forgetting subscale Discrepancy between objective and subjective memory measures HCs > MCI
 Vogel et al. (2004) [51] Copenhagen (Denmark) 36 AD, 30 aMCI, 33 HCs ARS CR MCI = AD
SRSMF SRD HCs > MCI = AD
Visuomotor Control (n = 14)
 Aggarwal et al. (2006) [52] Chicago (USA) 60 AD, 198 MCI [NOS], 558 HCs Pegboard test Manual dexterity HCs > MCI > AD
 Camarda et al. (2007) [53] Palermo (Italy) 11 AD, 11 aMCI, 11 HCs Reaching task Hand movement velocity HCs = MCI > AD
 Colella et al. (2021) [54] Rome (Italy) 14 aMCI, 16 HCs Finger-tapping task Movement rhythm HCs > MCI
Movement amplitude HCs = MCI
Movement velocity HCs = MCI
 De Paula et al. (2016) [55] Belo Horizonte (Brazil) 38 AD, 34 aMCI, 32 aMCI-md, 20 HCs Nine-hole peg test Manual dexterity HCs = aMCI, HCs > aMCI-md, HCs > AD; aMCI = aMCI-md, aMCI > AD, aMCI-md = AD
 Franssen et al. (1999) [56] New York (USA) 101 AD, 69 MCI [NOS], 195 HCs Sequential finger to thumb tapping task Manual coordination HCs > MCI > AD
 Huang et al. (2019) [57] Taipei (Taiwan) 36 AD, 43 MCI [NOS], 41 HCs Spiral examination Hand movement velocity HCs = MCI = AD
Yong examination Hand movement trajectory HCs > MCI > AD
Hand movement velocity HCs > MCI > AD
 Kluger et al. (1997) [58] New York (USA) 25 AD, 25 MCI [NOS], 41 HCs Finger-tapping task Gross motor skills HCs = MCI > AD
Purdue pegboard Fine motor skills HCs > MCI = AD
Grooved pegboard Fine motor skills HCs > MCI = AD
Purdue pegboard assembly test Complex motor skills HCs > MCI > AD
 Roalf et al. (2018) [59] Pennsylvania (USA) 131 AD, 46 MCI [NOS], 62 HCs Finger-tapping task Fine motor skills HCs > MCI = AD
 Robens et al. (2019) [60] Tübingen (Germany) 56 AD, 64 MCI (aMCI and aMCI-md), 67 HCs Digital tree drawing test Hand movement velocity HCs > MCI = AD
 Salek et al. (2011) [61] Toronto (Canada) 10 MCI (aMCI, aMCI-md, and naMCI-sd), 10 HCs Visuomotor integration task Hand movement velocity HCs > MCI
 Schröter et al. (2003) [62] Munich (Germany) 35 AD, 39 MCI [NOS], 40 HCs Handwriting task Manual coordination HCs > MCI > AD
 Suzumura et al. (2018) [63] Obu (Japan) 31 AD, 15 MCI [NOS], 48 HCs Finger-tapping task Finger Dexterity HCs > MCI > AD
 Yan et al. (2008) [64] Hayward (USA) 9 AD, 9 aMCI, 10 HCs Handwriting task Hand movement velocity HCs > MCI > AD
Hand movement smoothness HCs > MCI > AD
 Yu et al. (2019) [65] Kaohsiung (Taiwan) 22 AD, 14 aMCI, 18 HCs Graphomotor Task Hand movement accuracy HCs > MCI = AD

 >  Better Performance,  =  Similar Performance, 4MT Four Mountains Test, AD Alzheimer’s Disease, aMCI Amnestic Mild Cognitive Impairment-Single Domain, aMCI-md Amnestic Mild Cognitive Impairment-Multiple Domain, AMIS Awareness of Memory Impairment Scale, ARS Anosognosia Rating Scale, BVMT Brief Visuospatial Memory Test, CANTAB-PAL Test, Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery-Paired Associates Learning Test, CBT Corsi’s Block-Tapping Test, CR Clinician Rating, DMS Task, Delayed Match-to-Sample Task, EAT Ego-Allo Task, FAI Forgetfulness Assessment Inventory, HCs Healthy Controls, HVLT Hopkins Verbal Learning Test, LBD Lewy Body Dementia, MAC-Q Memory Complaint Questionnaire, MARS-MFS Memory Awareness Rating Scale-Memory Functioning Scale, MARS-MPS Memory Awareness Rating Scale-Memory Performance Scale, MCI Mild Cognitive Impairment, MFQ Memory Functioning Questionnaire, MLT Map Learning Test, naMCI Non-Amnestic Mild Cognitive Impairment-Single Domain, naMCI-md Non-Amnestic Mild Cognitive Impairment-Multiple Domain, NOS Not Otherwise Specified, OJD Objective Judgement Discrepancy, OLRT Objects and Location Recognition Test, PwD Patients with Dementia, RAVLT Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test, RBMT Rivermead Behavioral Memory Test, ROCF Rey-Osterrieth Complex Figure, SMCQ Subjective Memory Complaint Questionnaire, SRD Subjective Rating Discrepancy, SRSMF Self-Rating Scale of Memory Functions, VaD Vascular Dementia, VRST Verbal Selective Reminding Test, VWMT Visuospatial Working Memory Task, WMS-R Wechsler Memory Scale-Revised