Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Feb 16.
Published in final edited form as: Clin Trials. 2021 Nov 29;19(1):86–96. doi: 10.1177/17407745211046672

Table 2.

General characteristics of trials included in the review (N=62)

Characteristic Frequency (%)a

Country b
 Canada 2 (3.2%)
 United States of America 13 (21.0%)
 United Kingdom 14 (22.6%)
 European Union 17 (27.4%)
 Australia or New Zealand 5 (8.1%)
 Low and Middle-Income Country 4 (6.5%)
 Other 9 (14.5%)

Setting
 Primary care 8 (12.9%)
 Hospital care 6 (9.7%)
 Nursing homes 28 (45.2%)
 Communities 15 (24.2%)
 Other 5 (8.1%)

Intervention b
 Educational intervention targeting health professionals 19 (30.6%)
 Quality improvement targeting organization/health care system 17 (27.4%)
 Patient non-pharmacological intervention 29 (46.8%)
 Patient pharmacological intervention 3 (4.8%)
 Any intervention targeting caregiver only 12 (19.4%)
 Any intervention targeting the patient-caregiver dyad 8 (12.9%)

Control arm(s)
 No active intervention (usual care) 40 (64.5%)
 Scaled down version of active intervention 14 (22.5%)
 Placebo or sham intervention 3 (4.8%)
 Other active intervention (i.e., head to head comparison) 3 (4.8%)
 Otherc 2 (3.2%)

Data collection b
 Review of medical records 21 (33.9%)
 Routinely collected health administrative data 2 (3.2%)
 Mental or physical examination not required for normal care 33 (53.2%)
 Patient-focused questionnaires completed by patient and/or caregiver 45 (72.6%)
 Caregiver-focused questionnaires 22 (35.5%)
 Health professional questionnaires 4 (6.5%)
 Direct observation 3 (4.8%)

Single center or multicenter trial?
 Single center 5 (8.1%)
 Multicenter 56 (90.0%)
 Unclear 1 (1.6%)

Number of individuals (or dyads) randomized
  Mean (Standard deviation) 574 (1958)
  Median (Q1 to Q3) 267 (140 to 402)
  Range 101 to 15,574

Journal impact factor
 Median (Q1 to Q3) 3.6 (2.8 to 5.0)
 Range 0.9 to 27.6
a

Entries are frequency (%) unless otherwise indicated

b

A trial can belong to multiple categories; thus, numbers don’t add up to 100%

c

One study had two control arms: sham and usual care; another study had two control arms: scaled down version of active intervention and usual care