Skip to main content
. 2022 Feb 15;12:2488. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-06336-y

Table 5.

The accuracy characteristics of model F, averaged across different ages, compared with those of professional embryologists at the end of day 5, for a working point that minimizes false-positive rates.

Model/annotator avg{FP+FN} FP FN 0–1 accuracy PPV NPV Threshold
Embryologist 1 0.378 0.432 0.324 0.353 0.509 0.722 3.667
Embryologist 2 0.376 0.619 0.134 0.426 0.469 0.793 3.333
Embryologist 3 0.378 0.311 0.444 0.339 0.539 0.698 3.889
Embryologist 4 0.395 0.473 0.318 0.390 0.480 0.704 3.889
Embryologist 5 0.382 0.526 0.238 0.402 0.484 0.753 3.222
Embryologist 6 0.392 0.527 0.257 0.411 0.474 0.74 3.556
Embryologist 7 0.408 0.340 0.476 0.391 0.509 0.673 3.111
Embryologist 8 0.375 0.487 0.264 0.378 0.496 0.747 2.667
Mean embryologists 0.386 0.464 0.307 0.386 0.495 0.729 3.417
SD embryologists 0.027 0.095 0.104 0.027 0.022 0.035 0.392
Model F 0.331 0.408 0.254 0.332 0.540 0.770 1.896

For each score, the best threshold, False Rate, False Positive (FP), False Negative (FN), and 0–1 accuracy are reported.