. 2021 Nov 22;10(1):100459. doi: 10.1016/j.esxm.2021.100459

Table 4.

Side to side comparison of surgical outcomes of current grafting techniques

						Surgical outcomes %:
Study	Year	Journal	Study type	Graft type	Patients (n)	Penile straightening	PO ED	Penile shortening	Overall pat. satisfaction
Rosenhammer et al⁸¹	2019	Int J Imp Research	Retrospective	SIS and TachoSil	43 and 43	86 and 95	7 and 5	28 and 5	86 and 95
Morgado et al⁹²	2018	Andrology	Prospective	SIS	32	75	53.8	65.6	87.5
Hatzichristodoulou⁸⁰	2018	Int J Imp Research	Prospective	TachoSil	12	83.3	8.3	NA	91.7
Sayedahmed et al⁸²	2017	World J Urol	Prospective	SIS	43	74.4	11.6	27.9	86
Valente et al⁸⁴	2017	Urology	Prospective	SIS	28	82	36	14.3	82
Caraceni et al	2016	Urology	Prospective	Xenform	28	75	25	NA	87.5
Khawaja et al¹³⁷	2016	Urology Annals	Prospective	Dermis and temporalis fascia	13 and 20	100	9	NA	91
Cosentino et al⁸⁷	2016	Int J Imp Research	Retrospective	SIS	44	NA	5	NA	NA
Otero et al⁹³	2017	Asian J Andrology	Prospective	Pericardium	43	80.5	25	None	85.4
Wimpissinger et al⁹²	2016	J Sex Med	Pros/Retro	Vein	30	86	36	43	73
Zucchi et al¹⁰⁵	2015	Urology	Retrospective	Buccal mucosa	32	96	4	NA	85
Hatzichristodoulou et al²²	2013	Int J Imp Research	Prospective	TachoSil	63	83	NA	NA	NA
Kozacioglu et al²⁰	2012	Urology	Retrospective	Derm	38	92	34	NA	NA
Da Ros et al¹⁴¹	2012	IBJU	Retrospective	Tunica albuginea	33	90	24	18	90
Sansalone et al²¹	2011	Asian J Andrology	Retrospective	Pericardium	157	88	29	None	97
Staerman et al⁸³	2010	Int J Imp Research	Retrospective	SIS	33	67	11	25	79
Chung et al⁸⁶	2011	J Sex Med	Retrospective	Dermis, Pericardium and SIS	20,33 and 33	68	67	22	<35
Kadıoğlu et al⁴⁶	2018	J Sex Med	Retrospektive	Saphenous vein	144	87.5	33.3	N/A	75