Skip to main content
. 2020 Jun 13;44(6):739–747. doi: 10.1016/j.bj.2020.05.020

Table 2.

Comparison of treatment results〈change ratios, median (25th-75th percentile)〉between the four groups.

AcuT
AcuC
TriT
TriC
p value post hoc
After treatment Change ratioa After treatment Change ratioa After treatment Change ratioa After treatment Change ratioa
Pain scale
 VAS 3.1 (1.7–5.4) 0.38 (0.20–0.56) 3.3 (2.5–5.6) 0.13 (0.00–0.38) 3.3 (2.4–4.6) 0.40 (0.25–0.56) 4.7 (2.6–6.2) 0.17 (0.06–0.32) <0.01∗∗ bc∗,cd∗
 Pressure pain threshold 1.5 (1.2–2.0) −0.08 (−0.26–0.05) 1.6 (1.3–2.3) −0.07 (−0.28–0.03) 1.5 (1.2–2.3) 0.05 (−0.13–0.19) 1.4 (1.1–1.7) 0.00 (−0.15–0.10) 0.19
ROM
 Flexion 57.0 (54.0–66.0) −0.13 (−0.23–0.03) 50.0 (45.5–68.0) −0.06 (−0.20–0.02) 52.0 (42.5–61.0) −0.09 (−0.13–0.00) 52.0 (45.5–60.0) −0.05 (−0.11–0.03) 0.19
 Extension 62.0 (53.0–69.0) −0.03 (−0.01–0.02) 62.0 (49.0–65.0) −0.03 (−0.10–0.01) 53.0 (47.0–65.5) −0.06 (−0.14–0.01) 62.0 (52.0–70.0) −0.04 (−0.07–0.00) 0.76
 Ipsilateral bending 44.0 (41.0–50.0) −0.08 (−0.15–0.03) 40.0 (36.5–48.5) −0.11 (−0.25–0.02) 40.0 (34.5–44.5) −0.16 (−0.25–0.04) 44.0 (38.0–48.0) −0.05 (−0.08–0.01) <0.01∗∗ cd∗∗
 Contralateral bending 46.0 (41.5–51.0) −0.08 (−0.20–0.05) 42.0 (36.5–49.0) −0.11 (−0.21–0.00) 38.0 (34.5–43.5) −0.11 (−0.24–0.03) 44.0 (38.0–48.0) −0.05 (−0.11–0.02) 0.37
 Ipsilateral rotation 78.0 (74.5–86.5) −0.03 (−0.06–0.01) 80.0 (70.0–84.5) −0.02 (−0.04–0.04) 80.0 (67.5–85.0) −0.08 (−0.12–0.03) 80.0 (74.5–86.0) −0.03 (−0.07–0.01) <0.01∗∗ bc∗∗
 Contralateral rotation 81.0 (69.0–90.5) −0.03 (−0.07–0.02) 77.0 (74.0–85.5) −0.02 (−0.04–0.02) 82.0 (66.0–92.0) −0.03 (−0.08–0.00) 80.0 (72.5–85.0) −0.02 (−0.04–0.01) 0.39

p < 0.05; ∗∗ p < 0.01.

a

Change ratio = (before – after)/before. Abbreviations: AcuT: acupoint therapy group; AcuC: acupoint control group; TriT: trigger point therapy group; TriC: trigger point control group; VAS: visual analogue scale; ROM: range of motion; bc: AcuC vs. TriT; cd: TriT vs. TriC.