Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Feb 16.
Published in final edited form as: J Neurophysiol. 1998 Oct;80(4):1839–1851. doi: 10.1152/jn.1998.80.4.1839

TABLE 1.

Latencies in different types of hindlimb muscle tone suppression

Pontine-Induced Suppression Latency to Onset Latency to Trough
Ipsi Contra Ipsi Contra
Early-phase suppression
Traces (ipsi/contra)
 Type E, 23 (14/9) 21.0 ± 3.3 (14) 23.6 ± 2.3 (9) 28.6 ± 4.2 (14) 31.0 ± 3.7 (9)
 Type B, 162 (82/80) 21.1 ± 3.8 (82) 22.9 ± 3.6 (80) 27.5 ± 3.6 (80*) 28.9 ± 3.6 (78*)
P value: E vs. B 0.86 0.58 0.45 0.10
Latency to Trough Latency to Offset
Ipsi Contra Ipsi Contra
Late-phase suppression
Type B, 162 (82/80) 58.1 ± 5.3 (81*) 57.9 ± 5.4 (80) 70.8 ± 9.2 (82) 70.2 ± 8.5 (80)
Type L, 111 (52/59) 56.0 ± 7.2 (42*) 58.1 ± 7.2 (53*) 69.7 ± 10.7 (52) 68.4 ± 9.5 (59)
P value: B vs. L 0.06 0.88 0.51 0.24
Medullary induced suppression
Type B, 27 (15/12) 53.0 ± 14.5 (15) 55.4 ± 18.3 (12) 65.2 ± 6.3 (15) 64.8 ± 7.5 (12)
Type L, 33 (15/18) 48.9 ± 20.9 (15) 53.9 ± 16.5 (18) 66.2 ± 17.0 (15) 70.7 ± 12.3 (18)
P value: B vs. L 0.54 0.83 0.82 0.15 mean ± SD

Values expressed as means ± SD; number of traces in parentheses.

*

Differences in numbers of latency to trough caused by traces with a flat nadir.