Skip to main content
. 2020 Sep 5;314(2):203–206. doi: 10.1007/s00403-020-02136-4

Table 2.

Prevalence of receiving destructive/topical therapies and risk of developing SCC and BCC in parallel to destructive/ topical therapy during follow-up

Total Developed SCC (n = 189) Developed BCC (n = 169)
(n = 613) N (%) IRR (95% CI)a N (%) IRR (95% CI)b
Destructive treatment
 No 307 39 (13) 46 (15)
 Yes 306 150 (49) 2.1 [1.4–3.1] 123 (40) 1.1 [0.8–1.7]
Cryotherapy/diathermy
 No 335 50 (15) 58 (17)
 Yes 278 139 (50) 1.9 [1.3–2.7] 111 (40) 1.2 [0.9–1.7]
Topical treatment
 No 492 116 (24) 109 (22)
 Yes 121 73 (60) 1.7 [1.2–2.3] 60 (50) 1.2 [0.9–1.7]

SCC squamous cell carcinoma, BCC basal cell carcinoma, IRR incidence rate ratio, CI confidence interval

aAdjusted for age, sex, type of transplant, skin color and history of skin cancers excised/treated (Nil, ≤ 5, 6–10 and > 10)

bAdjusted for age, sex, type of transplant, education and history of skin cancers excised/treated (Nil, ≤ 5, 6–10 and > 10)