Skip to main content
. 2022 Feb 12;44:101293. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2022.101293

Figure 2.

Fig 2

Estimated odds ratio (OR) and the 95% confidence interval (CI) of receiving layperson BCPR for female OHCA victims from unadjusted and adjusted logistic regression analyses stratified by sites (reference: male OHCA victims).

Age, time of day and witness status were included in the adjusted logistic regression models. When analysing cases in all locations the model further adjusted for the location of OHCA (public or home).

None of the OCHA victims from India had layperson BCPR; hence it was not included in the figure. UAE was not included in the figure due to wide 95% CI: in unadjusted analyses the estimated OR was 1.61 (95% CI: 0.44–4.81) in all locations, 9.63 (95% CI: 1.16–65.83) in public locations and 1.76 (95% CI: 0.23–10.91) at home; in adjusted analyses the estimated OR was 4.82 (95% CI: 1.02–23.21) in all locations, 12.14 (95% CI: 0.92–296.68) in public locations and 2.77 (95% CI: 0.32–19.44) at home.

Cities and regions enrolled in PAROS study: Osaka city of Japan; Seoul, Daegu, and Gwangju of Korea; Kuching, Klang Valley, Kota Bahru, Miri, and Penang of Malaysia; Singapore of Singapore; Tainan, Taipei, and Taoyuan of Taiwan; Bangkok, and Songkla from Thailand; Dubai of UAE; Zhejiang province of China; Telangana of India.