Table 2.

Relevance of respiratory predictors for individual paradigms.

	Beta [CI]	t-value	p-value
Pitch 1—FCR response aligned
Level	0.102 [0.095, 0.110]	27.467	< 10–4
State	0.069 [0.019, 0.120]	2.685	0.0074
Phase	0.017 [0.004, 0.030]	2.589	0.0098
State*Phase	− 0.028 [− 0.046, − 0.009]	− 2.927	0.0035
Intercept	0.453 [0.400, 0.505]	17.033	< 10–4
Pitch 1—RT response aligned
Level	− 0.065 [− 0.073, − 0.057]	− 15.917	< 10–4
State	− 0.085 [− 0.141, − 0.029]	− 2.995	0.0028
Phase	− 0.021 [− 0.036, − 0.007]	− 2.921	0.0036
State*Phase	0.033 [0.012, 0.053]	3.158	0.0016
Intercept	0.266 [0.038, 0.493]	2.288	0.0224
Sound—RT response aligned
Level	− 0.060 [− 0.070, − 0.050]	− 12.196	< 10–4
State	− 0.093 [− 0.146, − 0.040]	− 3.465	0.0006
Phase	− 0.012 [− 0.025, 0.002]	− 1.666	0.0962
State*Phase	0.041 [0.022, 0.061]	4.194	< 10–4
Intercept	− 0.107 [− 0.207, − 0.008]	− 2.117	0.0346
Emotion—RT
Level	− 0.008 [− 0.034, 0.019]	− 0.571	0.5682
State	− 0.112 [− 0.177, − 0.048]	− 3.417	0.0007
Phase	− 0.017 [− 0.034, − 0.000]	− 2.019	0.0443
State*Phase	0.026 [0.002, 0.049]	2.147	0.0325
Intercept	0.094 [− 0.026, 0.214]	1.546	0.1231

The table lists liner model results for those paradigms and alignments that returned a significant effect of respiratory variables. The results (t-statistics) for all paradigms, alignments and variables are shown in Fig. 4.

Significant values are in bold.