Skip to main content
. 2022 Jan 21;17(1):89–107. doi: 10.18502/jovr.v17i1.10174

Table 1.

Data related to evaluated studies


Author Design Year Country Sample size PKP Sample size DALK Mean age in PKP Mean age in DALK Follow-up PKP (month) Follow-up DALK (month) PKP Sex Male PKP Sex Female DALK Sex Male DALK Sex Female Main value evaluated
Abdelaal et al[23] Retrospective cohort 2021 Saudi Arabia 15 21 Graft Rejection
Abu Eta et al[24] Retrospective cohort 2020 Israel 21 32 High-IOP
Akdemir et al[25] Retrospective cohort 2012 Turkey 30 30 28.07 29.67 12.58 12.58 16 14 14 16 BCVA
Alzahrani et al[26] Retrospective cohort 2018 UK 21 16 30.14 32.56 13.95 14.87 14 7 11 5 BCVA, CCT
Amayem et al[27] Retrospective cohort 2012 Saudi Arabia 30 47 26.5 24.3 24 24 Refractive Cylinder, SE
Bahar et al[28] Retrospective cohort 2008 Canada 20 17 42.2 32.5 53.2 17 11 9 11 6 Endothelial Cell Count, Infection Rate, Graft Rejection, Topographic Cylinder
Cohen et al[29] Retrospective cohort 2010 USA 30 11 35.4 45.5 21.9 22.5 21 9 8 3 Cataract Frequency, High-IOP, Graft Rejection, Refractive Cylinder, SE, BCVA
Donoso et al[30] Retrospective cohort 2015 Chile 49 90 31.7 28.3 48.6 36.8 High-IOP, ECC, Infection Rate, Graft Rejection, Topographic and Refractive Cylinder, CCT
Funnell et al[31] Cohort 2006 UK 20 20 32 28 12 12 14 6 11 9 High-IOP, Graft Rejection, Graft Failure, Topographic Cylinder
Godefrooij et al[32] Retrospective cohort 2016 Netherlands 736 297 38.07 35.65 499 237 204 93 BCVA
Hamdi et al[33] Cross-sectional 2017 Egypt 12 24 26.95 23.79 9 3 14 10 Topographic and Refractive Cylinder, SE, BCVA
Huang et al[34] Retrospective cohort 2015 China 79 68 24.3 24.1 93.1 93.5 50 29 40 28 Topographic and Refractive Cylinder, SE, BCVA
Jafarinasab et al[35] Cross-sectional 2011 Iran 45 23 29.8 27.2 31.4 29.2 Topographic Cylinder, SE, BCVA
Janiszewska-Bil et al[36] Cohort 2021 Poland 40 50 28.4 28.6 12 12 24 16 28 22 High-IOP, ECC, Topographic Cylinder, CCT, BCVA
Javadi et al[37] Randomized clinical trial 2010 Iran 35 42 30.89 26.91 24.6 22 28 7 29 13 Graft Rejection, Topographic Cylinder, CCT, SE, BCVA
Jones et al[38] Retrospective cohort 2009 UK 1917 455 Graft Rejection, Graft Failure, SE, BCVA
Kasbekar et al[39] Cohort 2014 UK 3124 1086 60 60 Infection rate, Graft Rejection, Graft Failure
Khattak et al[40] Retrospective cohort 2018 Saudi Arabia 99 108 28.9 27.8 29.3 28.1 59 40 67 41 High-IOP, ECC, Cataracts, Infection rate, Graft Rejection, Graft Failure, Topographic and Refractive Cylinder, SE, BCVA
Kim et al[41] Retrospective cohort 2011 Korea 38 19 26.2 25.3 51.7 22.6 25 13 17 2 SE
Koytak et al [42] Retrospective cohort 2011 Turkey 39 44 36.24 34.54 24 24 24 15 26 18 ECC, CCT
Kubaloglu et al [43] Cohort 2011 Turkey 24 20 30.2 25.6 6 6 112 95 Topographic and Refractive Cylinder, SE, CCT, BCVA
Macintyre et al [44] Retrospective cohort 2014 Australia 42 31 32.3 29.2 53.7 51.8 22 20 19 12 Cataracts, Graft Rejection, Graft Failure, Refractive Cylinder, BCVA
Motlagh et al [45] Cross-sectional 2012 Iran 57 49 35 30.3 SE, BCVA
Oh et al [46] Retrospective cohort 2013 Korea 5 11 27.4 28 45 30 3 2 7 4 ECC, Refractive and Topographic Cylinder, CCT, SE, BCVA
Pedrotti et al [47] Retrospective cohort 2016 Italy 16 16 34.1 35.9 7 9 7 9 Graft Rejection, Graft Failure, Topographic and REfractive Cylinder, CCT, SE, BCVA
Sogutlu Sari et al [48] Cohort 2012 Turkey 75 99 28.44 27.59 25.53 21.54 Graft Rejection, Refractive Cylinder, SE, BCVA
Watson et al [49] Retrospective cohort 2004 UK 22 25 33.9 32.6 55 28 14 8 17 8 Infection, Graft Rejection, Graft Failure,
Yüksel et al [50] Clinical trial 2017 Turkey 38 38 35.3 34.9 12 12 15 23 10 28 High-IOP, Graft Rejection, Topographic Cylinder, SE, BCVA
Zhang et al [51] Retrospective cohort 2013 China 52 75 21.9 20.6 60.2 46.9 45 7 55 20 High-IOP, Cataracts, Graft Rejection, Topographic Cylinder, SE
Ziaei et al [52] Retrospective cohort 2019 New Zealand 42 27 35 36.1 25 17 12 15 CCT