Table 2.
Hierarchical linear regression models predicting the affective states after the 10-kilometer race.
| Dependent variable | Energetic Arousal | Tense Arousal | Hedonic Tone | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model | Predictors | B (SE B) | β | p | F (R2) | B (SE B) | β | p | F (R2) | B (SE B) | β | p | F (R2) |
| I | Gender | -.16 (.55) | -.03 | .767 | 4.18 (.148) | -.10 (.37) | -.02 | .791 | 4.13 (.146) | -.46 (.55) | -.07 | .401 | 4.50 (.157) |
| Age | -.03 (.03) | -.10 | .212 | .01 (.02) | .05 | .506 | -.04 (.03) | -.12 | .144 | ||||
| Personal best | -.00 (.00) | -.14 | .118 | -.00 (.00) | -.02 | .858 | -.00 (.00) | -.08 | .378 | ||||
| CR | .05 (.05) | .08 | .319 | -.04 (.03) | -.09 | .257 | .12 (.05) | .21 | .011 | ||||
| PS | .28 (.08) | .29 | <0.001 | -.09 (.05) | -.14 | .078 | .07 (.08) | .07 | .356 | ||||
| PC | -.15 (.05) | -.23 | .004 | .15 (.03) | .35 | <0.001 | -.19 (.05) | -.29 | <0.001 | ||||
| II | Gender | -.21 (.55) | -.03 | .697 | 3.85 (.196) | -.09 (.37) | -.02 | .808 | 3.41 (.178) | -.47 (.55) | -.07 | .395 | 3.28 (.172) |
| Age | -.03 (.03) | -.09 | .278 | .01 (.02) | .06 | .492 | -.04 (.03) | -.11 | .163 | ||||
| Personal best | -.00 (.00) | -.14 | .123 | -.00 (.00) | -.01 | .931 | -.00 (.00) | -.08 | .362 | ||||
| CR | .08 (.05) | .13 | .124 | -.05 (.03 | -.12 | .161 | .13 (.05) | .23 | .007 | ||||
| PS | .23 (.08) | .23 | .004 | -.07 (.05) | -.11 | .177 | .04 (.08) | .05 | .586 | ||||
| PC | -.13 (.05) | -.20 | .012 | .15 (.03) | .34 | <0.001 | -.18 (.05) | -.28 | <0.001 | ||||
| CR x PS | .03 (.01) | .19 | .019a | -.02 (.01) | -.18 | .028 | .02 (.01) | .12 | .147 | ||||
| CR x PC | -.02 (.01) | -.14 | .092b | .00 (.01) | -.00 | .960 | -.00 (.01) | -.03 | .732 | ||||
| PS x PC | -.03 (.02) | -.12 | .131 | .01 (.01) | .04 | .596 | -.01 (.02) | -.06 | .458 | ||||
| III | Gender | -.27 (.54) | -.04 | .622 | 3.79 (.212) | -.04 (.36) | -.01 | .921 | 3.75 (.210) | -.49 (.56) | -.08 | .385 | 2.94 (.173) |
| Age | -.04 (.03) | -.11 | .179 | .02 (.02) | .09 | .285 | -.04 (.03) | -.12 | .152 | ||||
| Personal best | -.00 (.00) | -.12 | .177 | .00 (.00) | -.03 | .714 | -.00 (.00) | -.08 | .390 | ||||
| CR | .10 (.05) | .17 | .052 | -.07 (.03) | -.17 | .043 | .14 (.05) | .24 | .007 | ||||
| PS | .23 (.08) | .23 | .004 | -.07 (.05) | -.11 | .176 | .04 (.08) | .04 | .589 | ||||
| PC | -.14 (.05) | -.22 | .007 | .16 (.03) | .37 | <0.001 | -.18 (.05) | -.28 | <0.001 | ||||
| CR x PS | .03 (.01) | .16 | .048 | -.02 (.01) | -.14 | .088 | .02 (.01) | .11 | .181 | ||||
| CR x PC | -.02 (.01) | -.19 | .027 | .01 (.01) | .08 | .363 | -.01 (.01) | -.04 | .643 | ||||
| PS x PC | -.03 (.02) | -.15 | .065 | .01 (.01) | .09 | .291 | -.01 (.02) | -.07 | .420 | ||||
| CR x PS x PC | -.01 (.01) | -.15 | .095 | .01 (.00) | .22 | .018c | -.00 (.00) | -.04 | .706 | ||||
Significant predictors, as well as significant changes in models (p < 0.05) are marked in bold. CR = Conversion rate, PS = Perfectionistic strivings, PC = Perfectionistic concerns, x = interaction between variables, B = unstandardized regression coefficient, SE B = Standard Error of B, β = standardized regression coefficient.
a For a graphical illustration of the interaction effect see Figure 1, panel A, and panel B for Johnson-Neyman regions of significance.
b For a graphical illustration of the interaction effect see Figure 2, panel A, and panel B for Johnson-Neyman regions of significance.
c For a graphical illustration of the effect of the three-way interaction see Figure 3, panel A, and panel B for Johnson-Neyman regions of significance.