Table 2.
Usability ratings of the Tranquility program.
| Usability componenta | Rating, mean (SD; range) | Agreement with this statement, n (%) | Disagreement with this statementb, n (%) |
| I think that I would like to use the Tranquility program frequently | 3.75 (0.71; 3-5) | 5 (63) | N/Ac |
| I thought that the Tranquility program was easy to use | 4.29 (0.76; 3-5) | 6 (86)d | N/A |
| I found the various functions in the Tranquility program were well integrated | 4.25 (0.46; 4-5) | 8 (100) | N/A |
| I would imagine that most people would learn to use the Tranquility program very quickly | 3.88 (0.99; 2-5) | 6 (75) | N/A |
| I felt very confident using the Tranquility program | 4.13 (0.35; 4-5) | 8 (100) | N/A |
| I needed to learn a lot of things before I could get going with the Tranquility program e | 1.75 (1.04; 1-4) | N/A | 7 (86) |
| I found the Tranquility program unnecessarily complex e | 2.13 (0.99; 1-4) | N/A | 6 (75) |
| I think that I would need the support of a technical person to be able to use the Tranquility program e | 1.5 (0.53; 1-2) | N/A | 8 (100) |
| I thought there was too much inconsistency in the Tranquility program e | 1.75 (0.46; 1-2) | N/A | 8 (100) |
| I found the Tranquility program cumbersome to use e | 2.13 (0.83; 1-4) | N/A | 7 (86) |
aRatings ranged from strongly disagree (score=1) to strongly agree (score=5).
bReverse-coded items.
cN/A: not applicable.
dThere was missing data for 1 participant (n=7).
eItems that are reverse-scored (ie, low scores mean higher usability) are italicized.