Skip to main content
. 2022 Feb 2;6(2):e33374. doi: 10.2196/33374

Table 2.

Usability ratings of the Tranquility program.

Usability componenta Rating, mean (SD; range) Agreement with this statement, n (%) Disagreement with this statementb, n (%)
I think that I would like to use the Tranquility program frequently 3.75 (0.71; 3-5) 5 (63) N/Ac
I thought that the Tranquility program was easy to use 4.29 (0.76; 3-5) 6 (86)d N/A
I found the various functions in the Tranquility program were well integrated 4.25 (0.46; 4-5) 8 (100) N/A
I would imagine that most people would learn to use the Tranquility program very quickly 3.88 (0.99; 2-5) 6 (75) N/A
I felt very confident using the Tranquility program 4.13 (0.35; 4-5) 8 (100) N/A
I needed to learn a lot of things before I could get going with the Tranquility program e 1.75 (1.04; 1-4) N/A 7 (86)
I found the Tranquility program unnecessarily complex e 2.13 (0.99; 1-4) N/A 6 (75)
I think that I would need the support of a technical person to be able to use the Tranquility program e 1.5 (0.53; 1-2) N/A 8 (100)
I thought there was too much inconsistency in the Tranquility program e 1.75 (0.46; 1-2) N/A 8 (100)
I found the Tranquility program cumbersome to use e 2.13 (0.83; 1-4) N/A 7 (86)

aRatings ranged from strongly disagree (score=1) to strongly agree (score=5).

bReverse-coded items.

cN/A: not applicable.

dThere was missing data for 1 participant (n=7).

eItems that are reverse-scored (ie, low scores mean higher usability) are italicized.