Skip to main content
. 2022 Feb 1;7(6):5166–5175. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.1c06228

Table 2. Scope for Dehydrogenative Annulationa.

graphic file with name ao1c06228_0009.jpg

entry aldehydes 2 yield (%)b
  R2 3 4
1 Ph 3aa 50 (59) 4aa 10 (14)
2 4-OMe-C6H4 3ab 13 (21) 4ab 4 (7)
3 4-Me-C6H4 3ac 32 (38) 4ac 14 (20)
4 4-Cl-C6H4 3ad 50 (60) 4ad 13 (16)
5 4-CN-C6H4 3ae 63 (71) 4ae (2)cd
6 4-NO2-C6H4 3af 51 (73) 4af (3)cd
7 2-Me-C6H4 3ag 52 (57) 4ag 10 (12)
8 3-Me-C6H4 3ah 40 (46) 4ah 14 (18)
9 1-naphthyl 3ai 53 (64) 4ai 23 (25)
10 2-naphthyl 3aj 40 (47) 4aj 16 (24)
11 3-thienyl 3ak 12 (17) 4ak (9)cd
12 n-Bu 3al 22 (24) 4al e
13 sec-Bu 3am 31 (34) 4am f
14 tert-Bu 3an 28 (30) 4an 15 (21)
15 cyclohexyl 3ao 26 (32) 4ao f
a

Reaction conditions: 1a (0.10 mmol), 2 (3.0 equiv), [Ph3C]-[B(C6F5)4] (1.1 equiv), and DTBMP (1.5 equiv).

b

Isolated yields based on 1a. NMR yields based on the internal standard Me2Ph2Si in parentheses.

c

Not isolated.

d

Detection by the proton signals for NMR spectrum relative to the authentic sample. See Experimental Section in detail.

e

Not obtained.

f

Obtained silyl enol ether 5 instead of 4.