Skip to main content
. 2022 Feb 17;23:33. doi: 10.1186/s12931-022-01951-9

Table 4.

Subgroup analysis for the predicting value of ROX

Subgroups Number of articles Sen Spe PLR NLR DOR AUC
Overall studies 9 0.67 (0.57–0.76) 0.72 (0.65–0.78) 2.4 (2.0–2.80) 0.46 (0.37–0.58) 5 (4–7) 0.75 (0.71–0.79)
Population
 COVID-19 4 0.71 (0.56–0.82) 0.73 (0.63–0.81) 2.60 (2.10–3.30) 0.40 (0.28–0.56) 7 (5–9) 0.78 (0.74–0.82)
 Other population 5 0.63 (0.48–0.75) 0.71 (0.60–0.80) 2.10 (1.70–2.70) 0.53 (0.40–0.70) 4 (3–6) 0.72 (0.68–0.76)
Acquisition time
 6 h after receiving HFNC 6 0.67 (0.54–0.78) 0.70 (0.60–0.78) 2.20 (1.80–2.80) 0.47 (0.35–0.63) 5 (3–7) 0.74 (0.70–0.78)
 Other time 3 0.73 (0.67–0.79) 0.74 (0.70–0.78) 2.84 (2.39–3.39) 0.36 (0.29–0.45) 7 (5–10) 0.79 (0.75–0.83)
Cut-off value
 Cut-off ≤ 5 5 0.67 (0.65–0.76) 0.71 (0.61–0.80) 2.3 (1.8–2.9) 0.48 (0.37–0.63) 5 (3–7) 0.74 (0.70–0.78)
 Cut-off > 5 4 0.59 (0.54–0.65) 0.83 (0.79–0.86) 3.5 (2.78–4.43) 0.49 (0.43–0.56) 7 (5–9) 0.78 (0.74–0.82)

Sen sensitivity; Spe specificity; PLR positive likelihood ratio; NLR negative likelihood ratio; DOR diagnostic odds ratio; AUC area under curve; HFNC high flow nasal cannula