Skip to main content
. 2021 Oct 23;107(3):882–898. doi: 10.1210/clinem/dgab742

Table 1.

Characteristics of populations and interventions in the included systematic reviews/meta-analyses on vitamin D and concomitant calcium supplementation compared to placebo/control

Characteristics of populations and interventions No. (%) or range
Mean age, y 62-85.2
Sex
 • Men and women 9 (69)
 • Women only 2 (15)
 • Not reported 2 (15)
Residency status
 • Community-dwelling only 3 (23)
 • Institutionalized only 0 (0)
 • Both 8 (62)
 • Not reported 2 (15)
Mean serum 25(OH)D concentration at baseline, nmol/L 11.9-84
 • Reported 5 (38)
 • Not reported 8 (62)
Mean serum 25(OH)D concentration at follow-up, nmol/L 15.0-112
 • Reporteda 1 (8)
 • Not reported 12 (92)
Vitamin D dose frequency
 • Daily, IU/d 400-1600
 • Once, IU 300 000
Calcium dose, mg/d 500-1200
 • Daily
Vitamin D route of administration
 • Oral supplementation only 1 (8)
 • Oral and parenteral supplementation 4 (31)
 • Administration mode not mentioned 8 (62)
Individual trial duration
 • SR/MA including ≥ 1 trial < 12 mo 0 (0)
 • SR/MA including all trials ≥ 12 mo 9 (69)
 • Not reported 4 (31)
Fracture siteb
 • Hip 12
 • Total/Any/Other 11
 • Vertebral 6
 • Nonvertebral 5
SR/MAs with trials on individuals at high risk of fracturec 9

Abbreviations: 25(OH)D, 25-hydroxyvitamin D; IU, international units; SR/MA, systematic review and meta-analysis.

a Yao et al (30) reported change rather than follow up 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentration.

b Some MAs may include more than one fracture site.

c Previous fracture or osteopenia/osteoporosis.