Skip to main content
. 2021 Oct 23;107(3):882–898. doi: 10.1210/clinem/dgab742

Table 4.

Comparison of individual trials included in traditional systematic reviews/meta-analysesa and reasons for exclusionb of trials by some systematic reviews/meta-analyses investigating any fracture risk with calcium and vitamin D supplementation

Bergman et al (17)
2010
Gillespie et al (37)
2012
Avenell et al (15)
2014
Bolland et al (19)
2014
Weaver et al (29)
2016
Zhao et al (31)
2017
Hu et al (24)
2019
Yao et al (30)
2019
Eleni and Panagiotis (22)
2020
Pooled RR 0.95 (0.46-1.85) 0.95 (0.9-0.99) 0.92 (0.85-0.99) 0.86 (0.75-0.98) 0.94 (0.89-0.99) 0.74 (0.58-0.94)
Institutionalized RR 0.85 (0.74-0.98)c 0.67 (0.52-0.88)d 0.76 (0.62-0.92)e
Community RR 0.83 (0.59 and 1.16) 0.96 (0.91-1.01) 0.95 (0.85-1.06) 0.90 (0.78-1.04) 0.89 (0.74-1.06)f 0.96 (0.90-1.02)
AMSTAR Quality assessment Critically low Moderate Moderate Critically low Critically low Low Critically low Critically low Critically low
Total fx definition Any fx excluding hip and NV fx Fall-related fx at any site Any fx excluding hip, V, and NV fx Any fx excluding hip fx Any fx excluding hip fx Any fx excluding hip, V, & NV fx Any fx excluding hip and V fx Any fx including hip fxg Any fx excluding hip and wrist fx
Trials
Chapuy (45)
1992
NA
80/1387
115/1403
NA
Excluded institutionalized trials 10.67%
255/1634
308/1636
0.83 (0.71-0.96)
19%
255/1634
308/1636
NA
NA
66/877
97/888
0.69 (0.51-0.93)
Excluded institutionalized trials Excluded institutionalized trials 7.0
160/1634
215/1636
0.72 (0.58-0.89)
11.1%
80/1387
110/1403
0.74 (0.56-0.97)
Chapuy (46)
2002
NA
70/393
30/190
NA
Excluded institutionalized trials 1.57%
69/389
34/194
1.01 (0.7-1.47)
4%
69/389
34/194
NA
No data on any fracture as per SR/MA definition Excluded institutionalized trials Excluded institutionalized trials 1.6
70/393
35/190
0.96 (0.61-1.51)
7.9%
27/393
21/190
0.62 (0.36-1.07)
Inkovaara (83)
1983
NA Excluded trials not reporting fall outcome “Unclear whether the data represent fractures or participants with fractures” NA NA 0.2%
0/46
3/42
0.13 (0.01-2.46)
NA Excluded trials with total fx events < 10 NA
Dawson-Hughes (47)
1997
Excluded trials including men Excluded trials not reporting fall outcome 0.87%
11/187
26/202
0.46 (0.23-0.9)
1%
11/187
26/202
NA
NA
11/170
26/148
0.37 (0.19-0.72)
No data on any fracture as per SR/MA definition No data on any fracture as per SR/MA definition Excluded trials with < 500 participants 6.5%
11/187
26/202
0.46 (0.23-0.90)
Larsen et al (43)
2004
NA “The outcome is only ‘severe’ falls leading to acute hospital admission” “no treatment group received vitamin D & calcium alone” “It’s a cluster randomized controlled trial” NA “No treatment group received vitamin D and calcium alone” NA “Not randomized (cluster randomized factorial design)” 12.3%
217/4957
270/2116
0.34 (0.29-0.41)
Avenell et al (40)
2004
Excluded trials including men Excluded trials not reporting on fall outcome 0.14%
2/35
4/35
0.5 (0.10-2.56)
0.3%
3/35
5/35
NA
“Doesn’t qualify as an RCT of Calcium and vitamin D” 0.8%
2/35
4/35
0.5(0.10,2.56)
NA
2/35
4/35
NA
Excluded trials with < 500 participants “It assessed the open trial design and not explicitly the combination of Ca & vitamin D”
Harwood et al (NoNOF) (42)
2004
Excluded trials on post–hip fracture 1.5%
NA
NA
0.5 (0.16-1.56)
0.23%
6/75
5/37
0.59 (0.19-1.81)
0.5%
6/75
5/37
NA
NA
3/29
5/35
0.72 (0.19-2.78)
1.6%
6/75
5/37
0.59 (0.19-1.81)
NA
6/75
5/37
NA
Excluded trials with < 500 participants 2.5%
3/39
5/37
0.57(0.15,2.22)
Grant et al (RECORD) (41)
2005
Excluded trials including men 19.96%
N = 5292h
1.02 (0.87-1.19)
6.14%
165/1306
179/1332
0.94 (0.77-1.15)
14%
179/1306
192/1332
NA
NA
179/1306
192/1332
0.95 (0.79-1.15)
52.6%
165/1306
179/1332
0.94 (0.77-1.15)
NA
165/1306
179/1332
NA
6.6%
179/1306
192/1332
0.94 (0.76-1.17)
12.6%
387/2649
377/2643
1.02 (0.90-1.17)
Porthouse et al (44)
2005
NA
29/1321
38/1993
NA
10.14%
N = 3314h
1.01 (0.71-1.44)
2.52%
58/1321
91/1993
0.96 (0.7-1.33)
5%
58/1321
91/1993
NA
NA
24/607
22/602
1.08 (0.61-1.91)i
19.8%
58/1321
91/1993
0.96 (0.7-1.33)
NA
58/1321
91/1993
NA
2.8%
58/1321
91/1993
0.96 (0.69-1.34)
10.6%
58/1321
91/1993
0.96 (0.70-1.33)
Jackson et al (WHI) (48)
2006
Excluded interventions incorporating hormone therapy Excluded trials not reporting fall outcome 74.96%
2102/18176
2158/18106
0.97 (0.92-1.03)
49%
1921/18176
1961/18106
NA
Used post hoc analysis by Prentice et al (50) instead No data on any fracture per SR/MA definition NA 78.3%
2102/18176
2158/18106
0.97 (0.91-1.03)
13.0%
2102/18176
2158/18106
0.97 (0.92-1.03)
Bischoff-Ferrari et al (84)
2006
NA 3.75%
N = 3890h
0.46 (0.23-0.91)
NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
Bolton-Smith et al (85)
2007
NA Excluded trials not reporting fall outcome 0.07%
2/62
2/61
0.98 (0.14-6.76)
0.2%
2/62
2/61
NA
NA No data on any fracture per SR/MA definition NA Excluded trials with < 500 participants Excluded because “confounded by the use of vitamin K1 in the therapeutic regimen”
Salovaara et al (49)
2010
Beyond search period 11.63%
N = 3195h
0.89 (0.65-1.21)
2.82%
71/1586
82/1609
0.88 (0.64-1.2)
6%
78/1718
94/1714
NA
NA
78/1586
94/1609
0.84 (0.63-1.13)
23.9%
78/1718
94/1714
0.83 (0.62-1.11)
NA
78/1718
94/1714
NA
3.7%
86/1586
103/1609
0.84 (0.63-1.13)
11.0%
78/1586
94/1609
0.84 (0.63-1.13)
Prentice et al (50)
2013
Beyond search period Beyond search period NA NA NA
405/7530
458/7801
0.92 (0.80-1.04)
NA NA NA 12.6%
405/7530
458/7801
0.92 (0.80-1.04)
Liu et al (52)
2015
Beyond search period Beyond search period Beyond search period Beyond search period NA 0.4%
1/50
2/48
0.48 (0.04-5.12)
NA
1/50
2/48
NA
Excluded trials with < 500 participants NA
Xue et al (51)
2017
Beyond search period Beyond search period Beyond search period Beyond search period Beyond search period 0.7%
3/139
2/173
1.87 (0.32-11.02)
NA
3/139
2/173
NA
Excluded trials with < 500 participants NA

The trials by Chapuy et al (45, 46) are the only ones conducted in institutionalized populations. All the other trials are conducted in community-dwelling populations. Individual cells are filled with the following: Percentage is weight of each trial, number of fractures/treatment group, number of fractures/control group, and effect size estimate.

Abbreviations: AMSTAR-2, A MeaSurement Tool to Assess systematic Reviews 2; Ca, calcium; D, vitamin D; fx, fracture; MA, meta-analysis; NA, not available; NV, nonvertebral; RCT, randomized clinical trial; RR, relative risk; SR, systematic review; V, vertebral; WHI, Women’s Health Initiative.

a MAs not included in matrix: DIPART, 2010: individual participant data without details about individual RCTs (23); Tricco et al, 2017: Network MA without details about individual RCTs (39).

b Reasons for exclusion of some trials by systematic reviews/meta-analyses either as exactly reported or derived from inclusion/exclusion criteria.

c “The test for subgroup differences was not significant (P = .13).”

d Not a subgroup analysis; community and institutionalized were each analyzed separately.

e P for heterogeneity: 0.02.”

f This RR is for high D (≥ 800 IU/day) + high Ca (≥ 800 mg/day) vs placebo. RR for low D (< 800 IU/day) + high Ca (≥ 800 mg/day) is 0.48 (0.04-5.16). RR for high D (≥ 800 IU/day) + low Ca (< 800 mg/day) is 1.87 (0.31-11.13).

g Any fracture is defined as an fx occurring at any site, but if an RCT reported only hip fx, these were also counted as any fx.

h Only total number available (number of events per treatment/control is not available).

i CI for equally allocated subgroup.