Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Aug 7.
Published in final edited form as: Nat Methods. 2022 Feb 7;19(2):195–204. doi: 10.1038/s41592-021-01389-9

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Modeling results on 248 targets with experimental density maps by different methods. CR-I-TASSER versus (a) I-TASSER; (b) MAINMAST; (c) Rosetta-dn; (d) Phenix; (e) Flex-EM; (f) iMODFIT; (g) MDFF; (h) EM-Refiner; (i) Rosetta-Ref. The symbols with different colors denote different ranges of resolution: purple: 2–5 Å; yellow: 5–10 Å.