Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Feb 17.
Published in final edited form as: Eur J Cancer. 2019 Sep 12;120:132–139. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2019.07.024

Table 2.

FGF2 status at the baseline and randomisation and secondary efficacy end-points at the end of the lead-in period (week 12).

Tumour type Number of FGF2-positive patients/number of assessed patients (%)

Baseline Randomisation

Soft tissue sarcomas 142/218 (65%) 53/76 (70%)
Ovarian cancer 97/126 (77%) 36/39 (92%)
Breast cancer 50/63 (79%) 9/12 (75%)
Pancreatic cancer 23/29 (79%) 4/5 (80%)
Non-small-cell lung cancer 27/42 (79%) 7/11 (64%)
Gastric/esophageal carcinoma 30/31 (97%) 5/5 (100%)
Transitional cell carcinoma 22/25 (88%) 4/4 (100%)
Overall trial population 391/510 (77%) 118/152 (78%)
Tumour type Objective response rate Disease stabilisation rate Change in tumour size

Soft tissue sarcomas 2.8% (95% CI: 0.8–7.1) 28.9% (95% CI: 21.6–37.1) 40%a
Ovarian cancer 8.2% (95% CI: 3.6–15.6) 38.1% (95% CI: 28.5–48.6) NA
Breast cancer 8.2% (95% CI: 3.1–17.3) 20.5% (95% CI: 12.0–31.6) NA
Pancreatic cancer 0 13.2% (95% CI: 4.4–28.1) NA
Non-small-cell lung cancer 0 23.8% (95% CI: 12.1–39.5) NA
Gastric/esophageal cancer 8.8% (95% CI: 1.9–23.7) 8.8% (95% CI: 1.9–23.7) 75%b
Transitional cell carcinoma 0 16.1% (95% CI: 5.5–33.7) NA

FGF, fibroblast growth factor; CI, confidence interval.

a

FGF2-positive treated patients.

b

All but one patient was FGF2 positive.