Skip to main content
. 2022 Feb 3;9:800915. doi: 10.3389/fped.2021.800915

Table 4.

Significant differences in output measures of patients with a genetic test.

Group Characteristic Abnormal genetic test (n = 62) No pathogenic changes (n = 468) P
Associated anomalies CDH-complex (n = 207) 56a (27.1%) 151a (72.9%) 1,432E-14
CDH-isolated (n = 311) 6b (1.9%) 305b (98.1%)
CDH-unknown (n = 12) 0a,b (0.0%) 12a,b (100.0%)
Defect size A (n = 97) 10a,b (10.3%) 87a,b (89.7%) 0.000006
B (n = 50) 4a,b (8.0%) 46a,b (92.0%)
C (n = 157) 5b (3.2%) 152b (96.8%)
D (n = 32) 2a,b (6.3%) 30a,b (93.8%)
NR (n = 194) 41a (21.1%) 153a (78.9%)
Type of genetic test Karyotyping 297 (56.0%)
WES 51 (9.6%)
Array 362 (68.3%)
Trisomy 13, 18, 21* 530 (100%)

Significant differences when evaluating only patients with a genetic test. Trisomy 13, 18, and 21 were evaluated in 530 patients and more than half of the patients received at least karyotyping or SNP-array. An abnormal genetic test is seen more often in complex-CDH (P < 0.001) and defect size C differs from the missing data category (P < 0.001) as substantially more abnormal genetic tests are described in the later. Within a column each characteristic measure that does not share a subscript letter (a−b) differs significantly from those with different subscript letters (a−b) whose column proportions do not differ significantly from each other at the 0.05 level. WES, whole exome sequencing; MD, Missing data; CDH-C, CDH patients with associated defects; CDH-I, CDH patients without other associated defects; CDH-MD, CDH patients in which no additional information was registered; POE, Paraoesophageal hernia; EV, Eventration; BL, Bilateral hernia; AGT, abnormal genetic test; NPC, no pathogenic changes.