Skip to main content
. 2022 Feb 16;11(2):787–805. doi: 10.1007/s40121-022-00600-4

Table 3.

Previous research regarding COVID-19 prediction models

Class Studies Prediction type Outcome variable Data type Sample size Easy-to-measure input features
Our model Prognosis Mortality Nationwide 149,471 Yes
1 Zoabi et al. [25] Diagnosis RT-PCR Nationwide 99,232 Yes
Yanamala et al. [27] Diagnosis RT-PCR Local 3883 No
Gozes et al. [28] Diagnosis RT-PCR Local 157 No
Song et al. [29] Diagnosis RT-PCR Local 275 No
Feng et al. [32] Diagnosis RT-PCR Local 164 No
Jin et al. [30] Diagnosis RT-PCR Local 11,356 No
Punn et al. [31] Diagnosis RT-PCR Local 1214 No
Menni et al. [26] Diagnosis RT-PCR Nationwide 2,618,862 Yes
2 Cifuentes et al. [33] Prognosis Mortality Nationwide 1,033,218 Yes
Cho et al. [35] Prognosis Mortality Nationwide 7590 No
Ikemura et al. [36] Prognosis Mortality Local 4313 No
Her et al. [34] Prognosis Mortality Nationwide 5628 No
3 Subudhi et al. [38] Prognosis Complication or mortality Local 10,826 No
Shamout et al. [37] Prognosis Complication or mortality Local 3661 No
Marcos et al. [39] Prognosis Complication or mortality Local 1270 No
Kim et al. [40] Prognosis Complication or mortality Nationwide 4787 Yes
Su et al. [41] Prognosis Complication or mortality Local 14,418 No
4 Rinderknecht et al. [42] Prognosis Complication Nationwide 15,753 Yes
Wang et al. [43] Prognosis Complication Local 3008 No

RT-PCR reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction