Skip to main content
. 2022 Feb 17;17(2):e0264000. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0264000

Table 4. Kruskal-Wallis H tests of product preferences between clusters.

Cluster 1
‘Conscious tilters’ (n = 20)
Cluster 2
‘Unconscious tilters’ (n = 52)
Cluster 3
‘Non-tilters’ (n = 93)
n a dif H η2H
Frequency of use Mean ranking Mean ranking Mean ranking
Embedded livestream 103.353 87.51 76.101 165 2 6.52* .03
Virtual live updates 94.70 91.10 75.96 165 2 5.01
Statistics board 103.903 93.873 72.431,2 165 2 11.69* .06
Cash-out feature 92.50 83.76 80.53 165 2 1.16
Instant deposit 104.803 98.653 69.561,2 165 2 18.39** .10
Concurrent bets 91.38 87.00 78.96 165 2 1.75
High-odds / microevents 99.48 89.09 76.05 165 2 5.60
Importance Mean ranking Mean ranking Mean ranking
Embedded livestream 73.47 74.48 63.44 136 2 2.70
Virtual live updates 93.093 79.38 61.821 142 2 11.38* .07
Statistics board 91.18 81.74 69.73 152 2 5.12
Cash-out feature 74.42 75.19 78.66 153 2 .29
Instant deposit 94.753 86.373 67.671,2 154 2 9.63* .05
Concurrent bets 76.88 64.96 65.14 132 2 1.41
High-odds / microevents 66.75 69.22 63.75 131 2 .60

aParticipants who reported ‘never’ using a feature did not rate its importance.

1, 2, 3Representative of cluster that is significantly different (p < .05).

* p < .05,

**p < .001.