Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Primatol. 2022 Jan 11;84(2):e23358. doi: 10.1002/ajp.23358

Table 2.

Results of (a) a linear mixed model and (b) a robust linear mixed model assessing variation in total viral load. The marginal and conditional R2 for the linear mixed model were 0.37 and 0.69, respectively. Bold font denotes predictors for which p < 0.05.

(a) Linear Mixed Model
Predictor β SE 95% CI DF t p
Intercept 0.405 0.283
Health Status 1 0.857 0.224 [0.406, 1.327] 19.521 3.821 0.001
Age −0.295 0.248 [−0.793, 0.192] 14.856 −1.191 0.252
Sex2 −0.024 0.265 [−515,0.475] 14.698 −0.090 0.930
Community3 −0.052 0.345 [−0.773,0.621] 20.313 -0.151 0.882
Age x Sex 0.681 0.263 [0.161, 1.214] 14.699 2.591 0.021
Health Status x Community −0.643 0.278 [−1.232, −0.086] 19.513 −2.310 0.032
(b) Robust Linear Mixed Model
Predictor β SE - - t p
Intercept 0.359 0.178 - -
Health Status 0.803 0.214 - - 3.756 0.001
Age −0.327 0.136 - - −2.404 0.030
Sex −0.132 0.144 - - −0.916 0.374
Community 0.002 0.218 - - 0.010 0.992
Age x Sex 0.539 0.143 - - 3.769 0.002
Health Status x Community −0.619 0.265 - - −2.335 0.030
1

The reference category is “healthy”.

2

The reference category is “female”.

3

The reference category is “Kanyawara”.