Skip to main content
. 2022 Feb 17;12:2727. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-06721-7

Table 1.

Chi-squared goodness-of-fit information from Rietveld refinement of neutron diffraction data (Χ2 < 10 is a good fit) and results of aragonite, calcite, and vaterite percent fractions from each otolith ± SD for a pair of otoliths.

Fish ID X2A X2B % Aragonite A % Aragonite B % Calcite A % Calcite B % Vaterite A % Vaterite B
1037 4 4.57 0 0 43 ± 2 50 ± 2 57 ± 2 50 ± 2
1084 4 7.08 0 0 12 ± 1 51 ± 2 88 ± 3 49 ± 2
2082 11.6 52.8 1 ± 2 4 ± 1 31 ± 2 40 ± 2 68 ± 4 56 ± 2
2087 2.97 16.6 30 ± 1 9 ± 2 31 ± 1 30 ± 2 39 ± 2 61 ± 4
4213 2.22 5.72 90 ± 2 0  < 1 ± 1 59 ± 3 9 ± 1 41 ± 3
4452 3.83 1.97 0 7 ± 2 52 ± 2 36 ± 3 48 ± 2 58 ± 4
5244 3.03 18.7 100 ± 2  < 1 ± 2 0 53 ± 4 0 47 ± 4
5294 2.39 2.07 100 ± 2 100 ± 2 0 0 0 0

‘A’ and ‘B’ are used to denote parts of a pair because information on otolith positioning (i.e., left versus right) was not available.