Skip to main content
. 2001 Dec;39(12):4380–4386. doi: 10.1128/JCM.39.12.4380-4386.2001

TABLE 5.

Comparison of BACTEC MYCO/F Lytic bottle to BACTEC Anaerobic Lytic/10 bottle

Potential pathogen(s) or contaminant(s) No. of isolates with the following result:
P valueb
Positive with BACTEC Anaerobic Lytic/10 bottle only Positive with BACTEC MYCO/F Lytic bottle only Positive with both bottles Positive with neither bottlea Total
Pathogens
 All microorganisms 125 103 173 177 578 0.1643
Staphylococcus aureus 7 6 40 48 101 1.0
Staphylococcus spp., coagulase negative 30 28 35 46 139 0.8957
Streptococcus pneumoniae 9 0 7 3 19 0.0039
 Viridans group streptococci 16 4 11 8 39 0.0018
Enterococcus spp. 11 1 5 8 25 0.0063
Enterobacteriaceae family 18 15 62 30 125 0.7283
Pseudomonas spp. 0 13 1 5 19 0.0002
 Obligately anaerobic bacteria 24 3 0 0 27 0.0001
 Other bacteria 8 16 11 16 51 0.1516
Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex 0 2 0 1 3 0.5000
Candida spp. 2 13 1 10 26 0.0074
Cryptococcus neoformans 0 2 0 0 2 0.5000
Histoplasma capsulatum 0 0 0 2 2 1.0
Contaminants
 All microorganisms 8 7 1 142 158 1.0
Bacillus spp. 2 2 0 20 24 1.0
Corynebacterium spp., not C. jeikeim 1 5 0 19 25 0.2188
Propionibacterium spp. 3 0 1 2 6 0.2500
Staphylococcus spp., coagulase negative 2 0 0 78 80 0.5000
 Other bacteria 0 0 0 17 17 1.0
a

Refers to the number of isolates detected with only the Isolator system or the BACTEC Plus Aerobic/F bottle. 

b

Refer to Materials and Methods section for calculation of P values.