Table 2.
n | N (%) or Mean ± SD | |
---|---|---|
Gender (male) | 91 | 31 (34%) |
Age (y) | 85 | 84 ± 9 |
Age group | 85 | |
< 85 y | 39 (46%) | |
≥ 85 y | 46 (54%) | |
Length of residence (months) | 85 | 35 ± 65 |
Height (cm) | 72 | 161.9 ± 10.7 |
Weight (kg) | 83 | 66.7 ± 15.4 |
Capacity to consent (yes) | 91 | 68 (75%) |
Number of comorbiditiesa: | 73 | |
None | 4 (5%) | |
1–2 | 54 (74%) | |
≥ 3 | 15 (21%) | |
BI Score (score on a 21-point scale; 0–20) | 86 | 12 ± 5 |
BI score ≤ 11 (dependent) | 38 (44%) | |
BI score > 11 (independent) | 48 (56%) | |
FAC | 80 | |
Level 0 (non-functional ambulation) | 11 (14%) | |
Level 1 (ambulatory-dependent for physical assistance – level II) | 9 (11%) | |
Level 2 (ambulatory-dependent for physical assistance – level I) | 4 (5%) | |
Level 3 (ambulatory-dependent for supervision) | 3 (4%) | |
Level 4 (ambulatory-independent on level surfaces) | 34 (42%) | |
Level 5 (ambulatory-independent) | 19 (24%) |
Notes: Number of participants (n) is not equal to the total number of residents recruited due to missing data; a based on the Charlson Comorbidity Index
Abbreviations: BI Barthel Index; FAC Functional Ambulation Classification